PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DILAX vs. RPFCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DILAX vs. RPFCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davis International Fund (DILAX) and Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DILAX achieves a 5.85% return, which is significantly lower than RPFCX's 7.72% return. Over the past 10 years, DILAX has underperformed RPFCX with an annualized return of 7.63%, while RPFCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.17% annualized return.


DILAX

1D
1.66%
1M
6.29%
YTD
5.85%
6M
9.88%
1Y
24.40%
3Y*
20.57%
5Y*
4.11%
10Y*
7.63%

RPFCX

1D
0.42%
1M
1.14%
YTD
7.72%
6M
9.18%
1Y
23.75%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*
10.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DILAX vs. RPFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DILAX
Davis International Fund
5.85%30.70%21.56%5.12%-11.47%-22.00%22.69%26.58%-20.97%38.09%
RPFCX
Davis Appreciation & Income Fund
7.72%20.90%9.10%23.00%-15.65%25.74%4.74%20.33%-8.02%16.35%

Correlation

The correlation between DILAX and RPFCX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2007

0.69

The correlation between DILAX and RPFCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DILAX vs. RPFCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DILAX
DILAX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
DILAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DILAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
DILAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
DILAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
DILAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

RPFCX
RPFCX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
RPFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
RPFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DILAX vs. RPFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis International Fund (DILAX) and Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DILAXRPFCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

2.68

-1.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.98

3.87

-1.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.48

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

3.57

-1.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.58

13.82

-8.24

DILAX vs. RPFCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DILAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the RPFCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DILAX and RPFCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DILAXRPFCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

2.68

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.63

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.69

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.58

-0.39

Drawdowns

DILAX vs. RPFCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DILAX drawdown since its inception was -65.42%, which is greater than RPFCX's maximum drawdown of -56.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DILAX and RPFCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DILAXRPFCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.42%

-56.39%

-9.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.00%

-6.76%

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.52%

-14.82%

-6.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.82%

-25.63%

-21.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.66%

-30.72%

-20.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.44%

+1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.21%

-7.43%

-14.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.30%

1.74%

+2.56%

Volatility

DILAX vs. RPFCX - Volatility Comparison

Davis International Fund (DILAX) has a higher volatility of 6.25% compared to Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX) at 2.29%. This indicates that DILAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPFCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DILAXRPFCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.25%

2.29%

+3.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.72%

6.59%

+7.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.45%

9.01%

+8.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.98%

14.10%

+8.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.95%

14.78%

+6.17%

DILAX vs. RPFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DILAX and RPFCX have an expense ratio of 1.00%.


Dividends

DILAX vs. RPFCX - Dividend Comparison

DILAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than RPFCX's 5.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DILAX
Davis International Fund
0.77%0.82%2.22%1.55%0.00%1.38%0.00%3.28%2.47%0.11%0.17%3.81%
RPFCX
Davis Appreciation & Income Fund
5.99%6.09%1.11%2.91%2.63%0.28%0.78%2.03%1.09%0.83%1.09%1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


DILAX and RPFCX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DILAX has higher volatility (6.25%) compared to RPFCX (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DILAX dropped -65.42% vs RPFCX's -56.39%.

RPFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DILAX and RPFCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer