DIISX vs. DNLAX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon International Stock Index Fund (DIISX) and BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX).
DIISX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Jun 30, 1997. DNLAX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Oct 31, 2003.
Performance
DIISX vs. DNLAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DIISX vs. DNLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIISX BNY Mellon International Stock Index Fund | -1.59% | 30.36% | 0.36% | 13.93% | -14.57% | 10.85% | 7.52% | 21.48% | -13.92% | 24.46% |
DNLAX BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A | 22.63% | 14.75% | 0.86% | 1.33% | 33.83% | 38.00% | 6.30% | 16.33% | -17.78% | 13.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIISX achieves a -1.59% return, which is significantly lower than DNLAX's 22.63% return. Over the past 10 years, DIISX has underperformed DNLAX with an annualized return of 7.42%, while DNLAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.07% annualized return.
DIISX
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -10.76%
- YTD
- -1.59%
- 6M
- 2.91%
- 1Y
- 20.06%
- 3Y*
- 10.67%
- 5Y*
- 6.14%
- 10Y*
- 7.42%
DNLAX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- 22.63%
- 6M
- 31.46%
- 1Y
- 47.26%
- 3Y*
- 13.86%
- 5Y*
- 18.10%
- 10Y*
- 14.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DIISX vs. DNLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIISX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than DNLAX's 1.14% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DIISX vs. DNLAX — Risk / Return Rank
DIISX
DNLAX
DIISX vs. DNLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon International Stock Index Fund (DIISX) and BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIISX | DNLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 1.78 | -0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 2.24 | -0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.36 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 2.10 | -0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | 9.54 | -3.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIISX | DNLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 1.78 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.70 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.55 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.36 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between DIISX and DNLAX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DIISX vs. DNLAX - Dividend Comparison
DIISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than DNLAX's 1.79% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIISX BNY Mellon International Stock Index Fund | 4.66% | 4.58% | 0.27% | 0.29% | 2.23% | 3.42% | 1.62% | 2.80% | 2.66% | 2.17% | 2.89% | 2.12% |
DNLAX BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A | 1.79% | 2.19% | 7.75% | 12.54% | 9.80% | 5.04% | 0.91% | 1.95% | 1.53% | 0.40% | 1.26% | 0.98% |
Drawdowns
DIISX vs. DNLAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIISX drawdown since its inception was -60.03%, smaller than the maximum DNLAX drawdown of -69.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIISX and DNLAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIISX | DNLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.03% | -69.14% | +9.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.62% | -20.87% | +9.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.46% | -32.37% | +2.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.08% | -54.45% | +20.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.76% | -2.30% | -8.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.89% | -21.71% | +6.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 4.59% | -1.56% |
Volatility
DIISX vs. DNLAX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon International Stock Index Fund (DIISX) has a higher volatility of 6.85% compared to BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX) at 6.09%. This indicates that DIISX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DIISX | DNLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.85% | 6.09% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.39% | 15.21% | -4.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.04% | 26.61% | -10.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 25.94% | -10.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 25.58% | -9.04% |