DIHP vs. DGRO
DIHP (Dimensional International High Profitability ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIHP is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. DIHP is actively managed, while DGRO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DIHP returned 14.52%/yr vs 16.99%/yr for DGRO. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIHP charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
DIHP vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIHP achieves a 8.04% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 8.76% return.
DIHP
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 8.04%
- 6M
- 9.40%
- 1Y
- 19.11%
- 3Y*
- 14.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 22.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.30%
DIHP vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIHP Dimensional International High Profitability ETF | 8.04% | 28.26% | 0.50% | 19.07% | -10.88% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 8.76% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -4.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIHP and DGRO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2022 | 0.74 |
The correlation between DIHP and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
DIHP vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIHP
DGRO
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Industrials
DIHP
DGRO
Technology
DIHP
DGRO
Consumer Cyclical
DIHP
DGRO
Healthcare
DIHP
DGRO
Financial Services
DIHP
DGRO
Consumer Defensive
DIHP
DGRO
Basic Materials
DIHP
DGRO
Energy
DIHP
DGRO
Communication Services
DIHP
DGRO
Utilities
DIHP
DGRO
Real Estate
DIHP
DGRO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIHP vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
DIHP
DGRO
DIHP vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International High Profitability ETF (DIHP) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIHP | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.43 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 3.50 | -1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.42 | 13.52 | -7.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIHP | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 2.39 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.76 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
DIHP vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIHP drawdown since its inception was -24.94%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIHP and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIHP | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.94% | -35.10% | +10.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.92% | -6.47% | -4.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.42% | -14.03% | +1.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.76% | -0.28% | -2.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.85% | -3.44% | -1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 1.67% | +1.31% |
Volatility
DIHP vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional International High Profitability ETF (DIHP) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.21%. This indicates that DIHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIHP | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.27% | 2.21% | +2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.31% | 6.91% | +4.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.74% | 9.48% | +4.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 13.82% | +2.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 16.62% | -0.37% |
DIHP vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIHP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIHP vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
DIHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than DGRO's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.96% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
DIHP Dimensional International High Profitability ETF | 2.02% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.17% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIHP and DGRO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIHP has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIHP dropped -24.94% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 3-year performance, DGRO leads with 16.99% vs 14.52% for DIHP. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 16.99% return vs 14.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for DIHP.
DIHP has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 1.96% for DGRO.
DIHP is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for DIHP and 0.08% for DGRO.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIHP and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer