PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIG vs. QTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIG vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIG achieves a 66.35% return, which is significantly higher than QTAP's 14.67% return.


DIG

1D
2.57%
1M
-3.48%
YTD
66.35%
6M
59.45%
1Y
90.00%
3Y*
23.37%
5Y*
28.29%
10Y*
5.32%

QTAP

1D
-0.10%
1M
2.89%
YTD
14.67%
6M
15.56%
1Y
25.59%
3Y*
21.18%
5Y*
13.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIG vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DIG
ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas
66.35%2.73%0.93%-13.04%125.34%24.84%
QTAP
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April
14.67%19.36%17.34%43.32%-25.87%15.63%

Correlation

The correlation between DIG and QTAP is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021

0.18

The correlation between DIG and QTAP shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DIG vs. QTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIG
QTAP

Energy

61.8%
0.7%

Financial Services

6.0%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.3%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.7%

Healthcare

-

5.1%

Industrials

-

3.3%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

50.7%

Utilities

-

1.6%

Energy

DIG
61.8%
QTAP
0.7%

Financial Services

DIG
6.0%
QTAP
0.2%

Basic Materials

DIG

-

QTAP
1.3%

Communication Services

DIG

-

QTAP
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DIG

-

QTAP
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

DIG

-

QTAP
8.7%

Healthcare

DIG

-

QTAP
5.1%

Industrials

DIG

-

QTAP
3.3%

Real Estate

DIG

-

QTAP
0.1%

Technology

DIG

-

QTAP
50.7%

Utilities

DIG

-

QTAP
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIG vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIG
DIG Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

QTAP
QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIG vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIGQTAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

2.23

-0.90

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

15.20

-11.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.65

80.04

-69.40

DIG vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIG Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is lower than the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 4.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIG and QTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIGQTAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

4.62

-2.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.73

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.75

-0.75

Drawdowns

DIG vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIG drawdown since its inception was -97.04%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIG and QTAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIGQTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.04%

-29.44%

-67.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.29%

-1.69%

-21.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.41%

-13.03%

-29.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.02%

-29.44%

-16.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.27%

-0.10%

-51.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.37%

-5.04%

-59.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.49%

0.32%

+8.17%

Volatility

DIG vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG) has a higher volatility of 16.56% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 1.33%. This indicates that DIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIGQTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.56%

1.33%

+15.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.14%

3.97%

+29.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.88%

5.56%

+35.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.59%

18.89%

+32.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.81%

18.77%

+39.04%

DIG vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIG vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

DIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIG
ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas
1.50%2.62%3.13%0.61%1.33%2.24%3.18%2.72%2.30%1.76%1.09%1.56%
QTAP
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIG and QTAP have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIG has higher volatility (16.56%) compared to QTAP (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIG dropped -97.04% vs QTAP's -29.44%.

On 5-year performance, DIG leads with 28.29% vs 13.78% for QTAP. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DIG has performed better with a 28.29% return vs 13.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DIG.

DIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DIG and 0.79% for QTAP.

QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.62 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIG and QTAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer