DIG vs. COTG
DIG (ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. DIG is passively managed, while COTG is actively managed. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DIG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.
Performance
DIG vs. COTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIG achieves a 66.37% return, which is significantly higher than COTG's 12.95% return.
DIG
- 1D
- -2.58%
- 1M
- 20.98%
- 6M
- 33.99%
- YTD
- 66.37%
- 1Y
- 81.22%
- 3Y*
- 16.66%
- 5Y*
- 35.08%
- 10Y*
- 5.18%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.04%
COTG
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- 6M
- -8.93%
- YTD
- 12.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $660.67K | $1.03M | $1.54M | |
| $2.23M | $2.48M | $2.42M |
DIG vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 66.37% | -0.44% |
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 12.95% | -22.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIG and COTG is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIG vs. COTG — Risk / Return Rank
DIG
COTG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DIG vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIG | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.98 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIG vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIG drawdown since its inception was -97.04%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -32.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIG and COTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIG | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.04% | -32.16% | -64.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.26% | -26.33% | -24.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.27% | -12.04% | -52.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.68% | — | — |
Volatility
DIG vs. COTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIG | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.58% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.13% | 40.89% | +1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.16% | 40.89% | +10.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.79% | 40.89% | +16.90% |
DIG vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIG vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison
DIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, while COTG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 1.49% | 2.62% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 1.33% | 2.24% | 3.18% | 2.72% | 2.30% | 1.76% | 1.09% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIG and COTG have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DIG.
DIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.00% for COTG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DIG and 0.75% for COTG.
Find the right allocation for DIG and COTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer