DIEM vs. XC
DIEM (Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) and XC (WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds - DIEM tracks the Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index while XC tracks the WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DIEM returned 28.35%/yr vs 9.87%/yr for XC. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DIEM charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for XC.
Performance
DIEM vs. XC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIEM achieves a 32.78% return, which is significantly higher than XC's -3.47% return.
DIEM
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 12.08%
- YTD
- 32.78%
- 6M
- 35.57%
- 1Y
- 60.54%
- 3Y*
- 28.35%
- 5Y*
- 11.49%
- 10Y*
- —
XC
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- -3.47%
- 6M
- -2.10%
- 1Y
- 8.33%
- 3Y*
- 9.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIEM vs. XC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIEM Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 32.78% | 30.81% | 12.29% | 15.41% | 5.77% |
XC WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | -3.47% | 18.19% | 5.49% | 21.31% | 1.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIEM and XC is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2022 | 0.82 |
The correlation between DIEM and XC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
DIEM vs. XC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIEM
XC
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Healthcare
Technology
DIEM
XC
Financial Services
DIEM
XC
Consumer Cyclical
DIEM
XC
Energy
DIEM
XC
Communication Services
DIEM
XC
Industrials
DIEM
XC
Basic Materials
DIEM
XC
Utilities
DIEM
XC
Consumer Defensive
DIEM
XC
Real Estate
DIEM
XC
Healthcare
DIEM
XC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIEM vs. XC — Risk / Return Rank
DIEM
XC
DIEM vs. XC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIEM | XC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.11 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.93 | 0.67 | +4.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.34 | 1.94 | +18.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIEM | XC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.35 | 0.57 | +2.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.71 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
DIEM vs. XC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIEM drawdown since its inception was -38.61%, which is greater than XC's maximum drawdown of -20.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIEM and XC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIEM | XC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.61% | -20.97% | -17.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.33% | -12.47% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | -20.97% | +4.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -9.35% | +7.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.72% | -4.12% | -5.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 4.29% | -1.30% |
Volatility
DIEM vs. XC - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) at 5.00%. This indicates that DIEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIEM | XC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.52% | 5.00% | +3.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.91% | 12.60% | +3.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.17% | 14.78% | +3.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 15.87% | +1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.59% | 15.87% | +1.72% |
DIEM vs. XC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIEM has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XC's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIEM vs. XC - Dividend Comparison
DIEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than XC's 12.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIEM Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 2.30% | 2.99% | 4.92% | 4.45% | 6.31% | 4.06% | 2.75% | 5.98% | 3.87% | 2.61% | 0.35% |
XC WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 12.41% | 11.74% | 1.49% | 1.42% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIEM and XC have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIEM has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to XC (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIEM dropped -38.61% vs XC's -20.97%.
On 3-year performance, DIEM leads with 28.35% vs 9.87% for XC. On fees, DIEM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, XC has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DIEM has performed better with a 28.35% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIEM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for XC.
XC has the higher dividend yield at 12.41%, compared with 2.30% for DIEM.
DIEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index, while XC tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for DIEM and 0.32% for XC.
DIEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIEM and XC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer