PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIEM vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIEM vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIEM achieves a 29.85% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return. Over the past 10 years, DIEM has underperformed UGA with an annualized return of 9.27%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.31% annualized return.


DIEM

1D
-4.97%
1M
4.80%
YTD
29.85%
6M
30.75%
1Y
53.23%
3Y*
27.25%
5Y*
11.58%
10Y*
9.27%

UGA

1D
-1.12%
1M
-12.11%
YTD
64.09%
6M
60.42%
1Y
59.74%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
22.69%
10Y*
14.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIEM vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIEM
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
29.85%30.81%12.29%15.41%-20.61%6.92%1.27%12.23%-11.29%27.61%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
64.09%-2.00%3.77%1.27%46.34%68.49%-24.88%41.25%-28.07%1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between DIEM and UGA is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2016

0.20

The correlation between DIEM and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIEM vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIEM
DIEM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DIEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DIEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIEM vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DIEMUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.30

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.34

3.17

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.81

9.39

+7.42

DIEM vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIEM and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DIEM vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIEM drawdown since its inception was -38.61%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIEM and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIEMUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.61%

-86.59%

+47.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.33%

-18.96%

+6.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.82%

-26.68%

+9.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.34%

-38.11%

+4.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.61%

-75.89%

+37.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.97%

-18.05%

+13.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.68%

-36.69%

+27.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

6.43%

-3.25%

Volatility

DIEM vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) has a higher volatility of 12.21% compared to United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) at 9.24%. This indicates that DIEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIEMUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.21%

9.24%

+2.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.22%

30.57%

-11.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.98%

35.22%

-14.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.58%

34.45%

-16.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.91%

37.22%

-19.31%

DIEM vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIEM has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIEM vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

DIEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DIEM
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
1.63%2.99%4.92%4.45%6.31%4.06%2.75%5.98%3.87%2.61%0.35%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIEM and UGA have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIEM has higher volatility (12.21%) compared to UGA (9.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIEM dropped -38.61% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 10-year performance, UGA leads with 14.31% vs 9.27% for DIEM. On fees, DIEM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, UGA has been the lower-risk option at 9.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UGA has performed better with a 14.31% return vs 9.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIEM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

DIEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

DIEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while UGA is Oil & Gas. DIEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for DIEM and 0.75% for UGA.

DIEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIEM and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer