DIEM vs. SLVP
DIEM (Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) and SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index, while SLVP is a Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DIEM returned 11.95%/yr vs 17.51%/yr for SLVP. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DIEM charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SLVP.
Performance
DIEM vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIEM achieves a 34.62% return, which is significantly higher than SLVP's 7.79% return.
DIEM
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 13.76%
- YTD
- 34.62%
- 6M
- 37.79%
- 1Y
- 63.44%
- 3Y*
- 28.94%
- 5Y*
- 11.95%
- 10Y*
- —
SLVP
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 7.79%
- 6M
- 18.02%
- 1Y
- 126.39%
- 3Y*
- 54.77%
- 5Y*
- 17.51%
- 10Y*
- 14.27%
DIEM vs. SLVP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIEM Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 34.62% | 30.81% | 12.29% | 15.41% | -20.61% | 6.92% | 1.27% | 12.23% | -11.29% | 27.61% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 7.79% | 202.84% | 14.47% | -2.31% | -18.06% | -23.53% | 56.45% | 37.71% | -22.10% | 4.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIEM and SLVP is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2016 | 0.39 |
The correlation between DIEM and SLVP shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DIEM vs. SLVP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIEM
SLVP
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
DIEM
SLVP
-
Financial Services
DIEM
SLVP
-
Consumer Cyclical
DIEM
SLVP
-
Energy
DIEM
SLVP
-
Communication Services
DIEM
SLVP
-
Industrials
DIEM
SLVP
-
Basic Materials
DIEM
SLVP
Utilities
DIEM
SLVP
-
Consumer Defensive
DIEM
SLVP
-
Real Estate
DIEM
SLVP
-
Healthcare
DIEM
SLVP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIEM vs. SLVP — Risk / Return Rank
DIEM
SLVP
DIEM vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIEM | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.52 | 2.41 | +1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.44 | 2.60 | +1.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.36 | +0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.18 | 4.19 | +0.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.41 | 10.75 | +10.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIEM | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52 | 2.41 | +1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.41 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.10 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
DIEM vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIEM drawdown since its inception was -38.61%, smaller than the maximum SLVP drawdown of -80.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIEM and SLVP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIEM | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.61% | -80.47% | +41.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.33% | -33.57% | +21.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | -33.57% | +16.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.34% | -54.78% | +21.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -22.25% | +22.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.72% | -46.82% | +37.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 13.08% | -10.10% |
Volatility
DIEM vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) is 8.30%, while iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) has a volatility of 16.92%. This indicates that DIEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIEM | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.30% | 16.92% | -8.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.83% | 42.90% | -27.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.10% | 53.09% | -34.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 42.73% | -25.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.59% | 42.22% | -24.63% |
DIEM vs. SLVP - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIEM has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVP's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIEM vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison
DIEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than SLVP's 1.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIEM Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 2.27% | 2.99% | 4.92% | 4.45% | 6.31% | 4.06% | 2.75% | 5.98% | 3.87% | 2.61% | 0.35% | 0.00% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 1.65% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIEM and SLVP have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLVP has higher volatility (16.92%) compared to DIEM (8.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIEM dropped -38.61% vs SLVP's -80.47%.
On 5-year performance, SLVP leads with 17.51% vs 11.95% for DIEM. On fees, DIEM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, DIEM has been the lower-risk option at 8.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SLVP has performed better with a 17.51% return vs 11.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIEM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SLVP.
DIEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 1.65% for SLVP.
DIEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while SLVP is Silver. DIEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index, while SLVP tracks MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for DIEM and 0.39% for SLVP.
DIEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIEM and SLVP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer