DIEM vs. HEEM
DIEM (Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) and HEEM (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds - DIEM tracks the Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index while HEEM tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets 100% USD Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DIEM returned 11.49%/yr vs 10.71%/yr for HEEM. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DIEM charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for HEEM.
Performance
DIEM vs. HEEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIEM achieves a 32.78% return, which is significantly higher than HEEM's 31.07% return.
DIEM
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 12.08%
- YTD
- 32.78%
- 6M
- 35.57%
- 1Y
- 60.54%
- 3Y*
- 28.35%
- 5Y*
- 11.49%
- 10Y*
- —
HEEM
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 10.74%
- YTD
- 31.07%
- 6M
- 33.42%
- 1Y
- 64.96%
- 3Y*
- 27.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.71%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
DIEM vs. HEEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIEM Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 32.78% | 30.81% | 12.29% | 15.41% | -20.61% | 6.92% | 1.27% | 12.23% | -11.29% | 27.61% |
HEEM iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 31.07% | 34.02% | 12.59% | 10.14% | -16.85% | -1.82% | 17.94% | 18.53% | -11.09% | 27.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIEM and HEEM is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2016 | 0.88 |
The correlation between DIEM and HEEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
DIEM vs. HEEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIEM
HEEM
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Healthcare
Technology
DIEM
HEEM
Financial Services
DIEM
HEEM
Consumer Cyclical
DIEM
HEEM
Energy
DIEM
HEEM
Communication Services
DIEM
HEEM
Industrials
DIEM
HEEM
Basic Materials
DIEM
HEEM
Utilities
DIEM
HEEM
Consumer Defensive
DIEM
HEEM
Real Estate
DIEM
HEEM
Healthcare
DIEM
HEEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIEM vs. HEEM — Risk / Return Rank
DIEM
HEEM
DIEM vs. HEEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIEM | HEEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.35 | 3.75 | -0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.26 | 4.82 | -0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.70 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.93 | 6.12 | -1.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.34 | 24.52 | -4.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIEM | HEEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.35 | 3.75 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.63 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.50 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
DIEM vs. HEEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIEM drawdown since its inception was -38.61%, which is greater than HEEM's maximum drawdown of -33.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIEM and HEEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIEM | HEEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.61% | -33.53% | -5.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.33% | -10.83% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | -14.82% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.34% | -30.60% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.61% | -33.53% | -5.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | 0.00% | -1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.72% | -11.14% | +1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 2.70% | +0.29% |
Volatility
DIEM vs. HEEM - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) at 7.51%. This indicates that DIEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIEM | HEEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.52% | 7.51% | +1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.91% | 15.34% | +0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.17% | 17.65% | +0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 17.01% | -0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.59% | 17.97% | -0.38% |
DIEM vs. HEEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIEM has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than HEEM's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIEM vs. HEEM - Dividend Comparison
DIEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than HEEM's 3.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIEM Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 2.30% | 2.99% | 4.92% | 4.45% | 6.31% | 4.06% | 2.75% | 5.98% | 3.87% | 2.61% | 0.35% | 0.00% |
HEEM iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 3.03% | 3.98% | 2.38% | 2.75% | 7.49% | 1.93% | 1.49% | 3.04% | 2.37% | 2.05% | 1.84% | 6.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, DIEM and HEEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DIEM has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to HEEM (7.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIEM dropped -38.61% vs HEEM's -33.53%.
On 5-year performance, DIEM leads with 11.49% vs 10.71% for HEEM. On fees, DIEM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, HEEM has been the lower-risk option at 7.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIEM has performed better with a 11.49% return vs 10.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIEM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for HEEM.
HEEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.03%, compared with 2.30% for DIEM.
DIEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index, while HEEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets 100% USD Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for DIEM and 0.72% for HEEM.
HEEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.75 vs 3.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIEM and HEEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer