DIA vs. XLC
DIA (State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust) and XLC (Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DIA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average, while XLC is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DIA returned 10.14%/yr vs 8.03%/yr for XLC. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIA charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLC.
Performance
DIA vs. XLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIA achieves a 7.27% return, which is significantly higher than XLC's -4.85% return.
DIA
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 2.50%
- YTD
- 7.27%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- 23.20%
- 3Y*
- 16.29%
- 5Y*
- 10.14%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
XLC
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -4.66%
- YTD
- -4.85%
- 6M
- -3.59%
- 1Y
- 10.19%
- 3Y*
- 21.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.03%
- 10Y*
- —
DIA vs. XLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIA State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust | 7.27% | 14.71% | 14.82% | 16.02% | -7.02% | 20.83% | 9.59% | 24.70% | -5.58% |
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | -4.85% | 23.08% | 34.71% | 52.82% | -37.63% | 15.96% | 26.90% | 31.05% | -16.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIA and XLC is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018 | 0.69 |
The correlation between DIA and XLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
DIA vs. XLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIA
XLC
Financial Services
-
Technology
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
DIA
XLC
-
Technology
DIA
XLC
Industrials
DIA
XLC
-
Healthcare
DIA
XLC
-
Consumer Cyclical
DIA
XLC
-
Consumer Defensive
DIA
XLC
-
Basic Materials
DIA
XLC
-
Energy
DIA
XLC
-
Communication Services
DIA
XLC
Real Estate
DIA
-
XLC
-
Utilities
DIA
-
XLC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIA vs. XLC — Risk / Return Rank
DIA
XLC
DIA vs. XLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIA | XLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.12 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 0.86 | +1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.35 | 2.73 | +5.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIA vs. XLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIA drawdown since its inception was -51.87%, which is greater than XLC's maximum drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIA and XLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIA | XLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.87% | -46.65% | -5.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.76% | -10.57% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.95% | -17.97% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.76% | -46.65% | +25.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -6.72% | +6.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.14% | -10.58% | +3.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 3.33% | -0.80% |
Volatility
DIA vs. XLC - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) at 3.57%. This indicates that DIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIA | XLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.32% | 3.57% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.78% | 9.65% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.52% | 13.28% | -0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.85% | 20.68% | -5.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.56% | 22.17% | -4.61% |
DIA vs. XLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIA has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than XLC's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DIA vs. XLC - Dividend Comparison
DIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than XLC's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIA State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust | 1.37% | 1.43% | 1.61% | 1.81% | 1.91% | 1.58% | 1.87% | 1.85% | 2.24% | 1.97% | 2.26% | 2.33% |
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.25% | 1.13% | 0.99% | 0.82% | 1.10% | 0.74% | 0.68% | 0.82% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIA and XLC have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIA has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to XLC (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIA dropped -51.87% vs XLC's -46.65%.
On 5-year performance, DIA leads with 10.14% vs 8.03% for XLC. On fees, XLC is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XLC has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIA has performed better with a 10.14% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLC is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for DIA.
DIA has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 1.25% for XLC.
DIA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XLC is Communications Equities. DIA tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average, while XLC tracks S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for DIA and 0.13% for XLC.
DIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIA and XLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer