DIA vs. ILF

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

DIA (State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust) and ILF (iShares Latin American 40 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average, while ILF is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the S&P Latin America 40 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DIA returned 13.40%/yr vs 8.97%/yr for ILF. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIA charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for ILF.

Performance

DIA vs. ILF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) and iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIA achieves a 7.27% return, which is significantly lower than ILF's 14.45% return. Over the past 10 years, DIA has outperformed ILF with an annualized return of 13.40%, while ILF has yielded a comparatively lower 8.97% annualized return.

DIA

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 3.57%
• YTD: 7.27%
• 6M: 6.43%
• 1Y: 23.20%
• 3Y*: 16.29%
• 5Y*: 10.14%
• 10Y*: 13.40%

ILF

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: 1.16%
• YTD: 14.45%
• 6M: 13.56%
• 1Y: 41.16%
• 3Y*: 14.49%
• 5Y*: 9.30%
• 10Y*: 8.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIA vs. ILF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DIA State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust	7.27%	14.71%	14.82%	16.02%	-7.02%	20.83%	9.59%	24.70%	-3.74%	28.08%
ILF iShares Latin American 40 ETF	14.45%	52.65%	-23.11%	33.14%	9.81%	-13.59%	-11.71%	13.77%	-6.85%	26.33%

Correlation

The correlation between DIA and ILF is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2001	0.59

The correlation between DIA and ILF shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DIA vs. ILF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DIA	ILF
Financial Services	27.3%	33.3%
Technology	19.1%	-
Industrials	18.1%	9.3%
Healthcare	12.8%	1.1%
Consumer Cyclical	11.0%	1.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	9.5%
Basic Materials	3.7%	24.0%
Energy	2.2%	12.0%
Communication Services	1.8%	4.4%
Real Estate	-	0.8%
Utilities	-	4.4%

Return for Risk

DIA vs. ILF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIA

DIA Risk / Return Rank: 55
DIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
DIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
DIA Omega Ratio Rank: 55
DIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
DIA Martin Ratio Rank: 55

ILF

ILF Risk / Return Rank: 61
ILF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
ILF Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
ILF Omega Ratio Rank: 58
ILF Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
ILF Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIA vs. ILF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) and iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DIA	ILF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	1.83	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	2.44	+0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.31	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	2.92	-0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.35	8.90	-0.55

DIA vs. ILF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIA Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the ILF Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIA and ILF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DIA vs. ILF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIA drawdown since its inception was -51.87%, smaller than the maximum ILF drawdown of -67.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIA and ILF.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIA	ILF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.87%	-67.48%	+15.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.76%	-13.94%	+4.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.95%	-23.97%	+8.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.76%	-29.71%	+8.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.70%	-57.79%	+21.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.70%	-8.53%	+7.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.14%	-23.92%	+16.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.53%	4.56%	-2.03%

Volatility

DIA vs. ILF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) is 4.32%, while iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) has a volatility of 7.45%. This indicates that DIA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DIA	ILF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.32%	7.45%	-3.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.78%	18.62%	-8.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.52%	22.30%	-9.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.85%	23.27%	-8.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.56%	28.42%	-10.86%

DIA vs. ILF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIA has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than ILF's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

DIA vs. ILF - Dividend Comparison

DIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than ILF's 3.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DIA State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust	1.37%	1.43%	1.61%	1.81%	1.91%	1.58%	1.87%	1.85%	2.24%	1.97%	2.26%	2.33%
ILF iShares Latin American 40 ETF	3.84%	4.39%	7.44%	4.61%	12.72%	8.47%	1.88%	3.09%	3.12%	1.80%	1.59%	3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DIA and ILF in my portfolio?

DIA and ILF have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DIA or ILF?

ILF has higher volatility (7.45%) compared to DIA (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIA dropped -51.87% vs ILF's -67.48%.

Which ETF is better, DIA or ILF?

On 10-year performance, DIA leads with 13.40% vs 8.97% for ILF. On fees, DIA is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, DIA has been the lower-risk option at 4.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DIA or ILF?

Over the 10-year period, DIA has performed better with a 13.40% return vs 8.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DIA or ILF?

DIA is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for ILF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DIA or ILF?

ILF has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 1.37% for DIA.

What is the main difference between DIA and ILF?

DIA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ILF is Latin America Equities. DIA tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average, while ILF tracks S&P Latin America 40 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for DIA and 0.48% for ILF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ILF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.