DIA.AS vs. ^IXIC
DIA.AS (SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust) is Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while ^IXIC (NASDAQ Composite) is an index. Over the past 10 years, DIA.AS returned 13.06%/yr vs 18.19%/yr for ^IXIC. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DIA.AS vs. ^IXIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DIA.AS is traded in EUR, while ^IXIC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^IXIC values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIA.AS achieves a 7.19% return, which is significantly lower than ^IXIC's 16.93% return. Over the past 10 years, DIA.AS has underperformed ^IXIC with an annualized return of 13.06%, while ^IXIC has yielded a comparatively higher 18.19% annualized return.
DIA.AS
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 7.19%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- 1Y
- 20.20%
- 3Y*
- 13.70%
- 5Y*
- 10.94%
- 10Y*
- 13.06%
^IXIC
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 7.89%
- YTD
- 16.93%
- 6M
- 15.12%
- 1Y
- 35.67%
- 3Y*
- 23.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.29%
- 10Y*
- 18.19%
DIA.AS vs. ^IXIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIA.AS SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust | 7.19% | 2.13% | 22.48% | 11.53% | -1.09% | 31.76% | -0.04% | 26.82% | 0.96% | 12.57% |
^IXIC NASDAQ Composite | 16.93% | 6.07% | 37.13% | 39.12% | -28.95% | 30.47% | 31.80% | 38.28% | 0.63% | 12.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIA.AS and ^IXIC is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DIA.AS and ^IXIC has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIA.AS vs. ^IXIC — Risk / Return Rank
DIA.AS
^IXIC
DIA.AS vs. ^IXIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA.AS) and NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIA.AS | ^IXIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.12 | 1.38 | +0.74 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 2.91 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.35 | 9.45 | +2.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIA.AS | ^IXIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 2.18 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.70 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.82 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.64 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
DIA.AS vs. ^IXIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIA.AS drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, which is greater than ^IXIC's maximum drawdown of -49.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIA.AS and ^IXIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIA.AS | ^IXIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.02% | -49.37% | -9.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.71% | -12.32% | +6.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.07% | -28.54% | +7.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.07% | -32.41% | +11.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.08% | -32.41% | -3.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.67% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.92% | -8.78% | -3.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 3.78% | -2.16% |
Volatility
DIA.AS vs. ^IXIC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA.AS) is 2.35%, while NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) has a volatility of 3.63%. This indicates that DIA.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^IXIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIA.AS | ^IXIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.35% | 3.63% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.88% | 11.53% | -3.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.05% | 16.52% | -7.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.49% | 22.07% | -8.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 22.31% | -5.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIA.AS and ^IXIC have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for DIA.AS and ^IXIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer