DHYA.L vs. EIMI.L
DHYA.L (iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and EIMI.L (iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DHYA.L is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while EIMI.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DHYA.L returned 3.78%/yr vs 7.61%/yr for EIMI.L. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DHYA.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EIMI.L.
Performance
DHYA.L vs. EIMI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DHYA.L achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly lower than EIMI.L's 24.25% return.
DHYA.L
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 1.20%
- 6M
- 1.69%
- 1Y
- 6.66%
- 3Y*
- 8.68%
- 5Y*
- 3.78%
- 10Y*
- —
EIMI.L
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 24.25%
- 6M
- 27.21%
- 1Y
- 49.41%
- 3Y*
- 23.30%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.26%
DHYA.L vs. EIMI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHYA.L iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.20% | 8.50% | 8.26% | 12.25% | -12.01% | 3.82% | 7.49% | 0.45% |
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF | 24.25% | 32.16% | 7.36% | 11.03% | -19.67% | -0.65% | 18.80% | 6.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between DHYA.L and EIMI.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2019 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DHYA.L vs. EIMI.L — Risk / Return Rank
DHYA.L
EIMI.L
DHYA.L vs. EIMI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DHYA.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DHYA.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.47 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 3.88 | -1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.33 | 14.02 | -2.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DHYA.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 2.56 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.42 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.36 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
DHYA.L vs. EIMI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHYA.L drawdown since its inception was -16.70%, smaller than the maximum EIMI.L drawdown of -38.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHYA.L and EIMI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHYA.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.70% | -38.73% | +22.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.56% | -12.66% | +10.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.13% | -17.44% | +12.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.29% | -35.50% | +19.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -2.64% | +2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.69% | -14.04% | +10.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | 3.52% | -2.93% |
Volatility
DHYA.L vs. EIMI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DHYA.L) is 1.53%, while iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) has a volatility of 8.18%. This indicates that DHYA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIMI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DHYA.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.53% | 8.18% | -6.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.29% | 16.71% | -13.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.98% | 19.23% | -15.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.27% | 18.31% | -11.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.19% | 19.15% | -8.96% |
DHYA.L vs. EIMI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DHYA.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EIMI.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DHYA.L vs. EIMI.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither DHYA.L nor EIMI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DHYA.L and EIMI.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EIMI.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EIMI.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DHYA.L.
DHYA.L is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while EIMI.L is Emerging Markets Equities. DHYA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while EIMI.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DHYA.L and 0.18% for EIMI.L.
Find the right allocation for DHYA.L and EIMI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer