DHSB vs. QYLD
DHSB (Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DHSB is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Day Hagan, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. DHSB is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, DHSB returned 9.84% vs 23.93% for QYLD. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DHSB charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.
Performance
DHSB vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DHSB achieves a 4.21% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.88% return.
DHSB
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 4.21%
- 6M
- 5.04%
- 1Y
- 9.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 7.88%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 23.93%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
DHSB vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DHSB Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF | 4.21% | 4.80% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 7.88% | 4.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between DHSB and QYLD is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2025 | 0.71 |
The correlation between DHSB and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DHSB vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
DHSB
QYLD
DHSB vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF (DHSB) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DHSB | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.63 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 4.84 | -1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.55 | 28.36 | -12.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DHSB | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 2.80 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.59 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
DHSB vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHSB drawdown since its inception was -7.65%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHSB and QYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHSB | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.65% | -24.75% | +17.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.32% | -4.97% | +1.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.06% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.88% | -3.84% | +2.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.63% | 0.85% | -0.22% |
Volatility
DHSB vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF (DHSB) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.85%. This indicates that DHSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DHSB | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | 1.85% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.20% | 7.12% | -1.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.70% | 8.58% | -2.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.63% | 14.70% | -6.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.63% | 15.49% | -6.86% |
DHSB vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DHSB has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
DHSB vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
DHSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than QYLD's 11.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHSB Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF | 1.20% | 1.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.46% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DHSB and QYLD have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DHSB has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to QYLD (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHSB dropped -7.65% vs QYLD's -24.75%.
On 1-year performance, QYLD leads with 23.93% vs 9.84% for DHSB. On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QYLD has performed better with a 23.93% return vs 9.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DHSB.
QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.46%, compared with 1.20% for DHSB.
DHSB is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Day Hagan and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for DHSB and 0.60% for QYLD.
QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DHSB and QYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer