DHS vs. SEIV
DHS (WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund) and SEIV (SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. DHS is passively managed, while SEIV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DHS returned 17.11%/yr vs 25.70%/yr for SEIV. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DHS charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SEIV.
Performance
DHS vs. SEIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DHS achieves a 17.07% return, which is significantly lower than SEIV's 20.90% return.
DHS
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 9.42%
- YTD
- 17.07%
- 1Y
- 25.65%
- 3Y*
- 17.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.40%
- 10Y*
- 9.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.26%
SEIV
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 4.15%
- 6M
- 17.50%
- YTD
- 20.90%
- 1Y
- 42.78%
- 3Y*
- 25.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.47M | $3.71M | $2.99M | |
| $9.14M | $9.18M | $6.19M |
DHS vs. SEIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 17.07% | 12.87% | 18.02% | -0.19% | -0.95% |
SEIV SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF | 20.90% | 27.43% | 19.73% | 21.90% | -5.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between DHS and SEIV is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DHS and SEIV has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DHS vs. SEIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DHS
SEIV
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
DHS
SEIV
Healthcare
DHS
SEIV
Consumer Defensive
DHS
SEIV
Utilities
DHS
SEIV
Energy
DHS
SEIV
Communication Services
DHS
SEIV
Technology
DHS
SEIV
Consumer Cyclical
DHS
SEIV
Industrials
DHS
SEIV
Real Estate
DHS
SEIV
Basic Materials
DHS
SEIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DHS vs. SEIV — Risk / Return Rank
DHS
SEIV
DHS vs. SEIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) and SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF (SEIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DHS | SEIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.61 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.09 | 6.19 | -2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.00 | 22.94 | -7.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DHS vs. SEIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHS drawdown since its inception was -67.25%, which is greater than SEIV's maximum drawdown of -18.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHS and SEIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHS | SEIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.25% | -18.18% | -49.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.30% | -6.95% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.87% | -17.71% | +5.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | 0.00% | -1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | -3.42% | -6.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 1.87% | -0.16% |
Volatility
DHS vs. SEIV - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) has a higher volatility of 3.77% compared to SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF (SEIV) at 3.44%. This indicates that DHS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DHS | SEIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 3.44% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.84% | 9.52% | -1.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.40% | 12.76% | -2.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 16.54% | -2.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.10% | 16.54% | -0.44% |
DHS vs. SEIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DHS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIV's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
DHS vs. SEIV - Dividend Comparison
DHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than SEIV's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 3.18% | 3.32% | 3.66% | 4.31% | 3.42% | 3.29% | 4.14% | 3.69% | 3.76% | 3.00% | 3.25% | 3.53% |
SEIV SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF | 1.43% | 1.51% | 1.66% | 2.08% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DHS and SEIV have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DHS has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to SEIV (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHS dropped -67.25% vs SEIV's -18.18%.
On 3-year performance, SEIV leads with 25.70% vs 17.11% for DHS. On fees, SEIV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SEIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SEIV has performed better with a 25.70% return vs 17.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SEIV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DHS.
DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 1.43% for SEIV.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DHS and 0.15% for SEIV.
SEIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DHS and SEIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer