DHS vs. QGRW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DHS (WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund) and QGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DHS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index, while QGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DHS returned 16.39%/yr vs 29.10%/yr for QGRW. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DHS charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QGRW.

Performance

DHS vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHS achieves a 9.88% return, which is significantly lower than QGRW's 15.43% return.

DHS

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: -0.16%
• YTD: 9.88%
• 6M: 10.38%
• 1Y: 20.55%
• 3Y*: 16.39%
• 5Y*: 10.59%
• 10Y*: 9.47%

QGRW

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 9.03%
• YTD: 15.43%
• 6M: 14.57%
• 1Y: 35.66%
• 3Y*: 29.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DHS vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund	9.88%	12.87%	18.02%	-0.19%	0.09%
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	15.43%	19.20%	34.85%	56.05%	-3.30%

Correlation

The correlation between DHS and QGRW is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2022	0.24

The correlation between DHS and QGRW shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DHS vs. QGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DHS	QGRW
Financial Services	22.3%	4.1%
Consumer Defensive	18.7%	0.5%
Healthcare	14.5%	4.3%
Energy	9.4%	0.6%
Communication Services	9.3%	17.8%
Utilities	9.0%	0.4%
Consumer Cyclical	5.0%	12.4%
Industrials	4.1%	8.0%
Technology	3.7%	52.1%
Real Estate	2.8%	-
Basic Materials	1.2%	-

Return for Risk

DHS vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DHS

DHS Risk / Return Rank: 62
DHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
DHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
DHS Omega Ratio Rank: 57
DHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
DHS Martin Ratio Rank: 65

QGRW

QGRW Risk / Return Rank: 54
QGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
QGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
QGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 57
QGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
QGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DHS vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DHS	QGRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	2.06	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	2.75	+0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.35	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.28	2.32	+0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.04	9.08	+2.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DHS vs. QGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHS Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the QGRW Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHS and QGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DHS	QGRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06	2.06	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	1.66	-1.25

Drawdowns

DHS vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHS drawdown since its inception was -67.25%, which is greater than QGRW's maximum drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHS and QGRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	DHS	QGRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.25%	-24.40%	-42.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.30%	-15.44%	+9.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.87%	-24.40%	+12.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.60%	-1.33%	-1.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.55%	-3.26%	-6.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.71%	3.94%	-2.23%

Volatility

DHS vs. QGRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) is 2.88%, while WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that DHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DHS	QGRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.88%	4.71%	-1.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.32%	13.67%	-6.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.01%	17.40%	-7.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.89%	21.08%	-7.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.08%	21.08%	-5.00%

DHS vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

DHS vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison

DHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than QGRW's 0.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund	3.35%	3.32%	3.66%	4.31%	3.42%	3.29%	4.14%	3.69%	3.76%	3.00%	3.25%	3.53%
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	0.07%	0.09%	0.14%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DHS and QGRW in my portfolio?

DHS and QGRW have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DHS or QGRW?

QGRW has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to DHS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHS dropped -67.25% vs QGRW's -24.40%.

Which ETF is better, DHS or QGRW?

On 3-year performance, QGRW leads with 29.10% vs 16.39% for DHS. On fees, QGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DHS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DHS or QGRW?

Over the 3-year period, QGRW has performed better with a 29.10% return vs 16.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DHS or QGRW?

QGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DHS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DHS or QGRW?

DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 0.07% for QGRW.

What is the main difference between DHS and QGRW?

DHS is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while QGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. DHS tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index, while QGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DHS and 0.28% for QGRW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.