PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHS vs. HAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DHS vs. HAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) and VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DHS having a 17.07% return and HAP slightly higher at 17.54%. Over the past 10 years, DHS has underperformed HAP with an annualized return of 9.67%, while HAP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.28% annualized return.


DHS

1D
0.35%
1M
1.94%
6M
9.42%
YTD
17.07%
1Y
25.65%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
12.40%
10Y*
9.67%
ALL TIME*
8.26%

HAP

1D
-0.50%
1M
2.30%
6M
5.27%
YTD
17.54%
1Y
38.48%
3Y*
15.28%
5Y*
12.21%
10Y*
11.28%
ALL TIME*
5.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.47M$3.71M$2.99M
$2.74M$3.44M$2.56M

DHS vs. HAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
17.07%12.87%18.02%-0.19%7.97%23.20%-5.70%22.59%-7.41%11.69%
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
17.54%34.91%-4.08%2.46%7.84%25.04%6.30%18.60%-10.68%17.12%

Correlation

The correlation between DHS and HAP is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2008

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between DHS and HAP has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DHS vs. HAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DHS
HAP

Financial Services

23.2%

-

Healthcare

15.9%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

14.2%
6.3%

Utilities

8.9%
9.8%

Energy

8.2%
28.7%

Communication Services

8.2%

-

Technology

7.4%
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
0.2%

Industrials

4.5%
11.6%

Real Estate

3.0%
0.4%

Basic Materials

1.1%
38.2%

Financial Services

DHS
23.2%
HAP

-

Healthcare

DHS
15.9%
HAP
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

DHS
14.2%
HAP
6.3%

Utilities

DHS
8.9%
HAP
9.8%

Energy

DHS
8.2%
HAP
28.7%

Communication Services

DHS
8.2%
HAP

-

Technology

DHS
7.4%
HAP
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DHS
5.4%
HAP
0.2%

Industrials

DHS
4.5%
HAP
11.6%

Real Estate

DHS
3.0%
HAP
0.4%

Basic Materials

DHS
1.1%
HAP
38.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHS vs. HAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DHS
DHS Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHS Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

HAP
HAP Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
HAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
HAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAP Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DHS vs. HAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) and VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DHSHAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.44

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.09

4.25

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.00

11.97

+3.03

DHS vs. HAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHS Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the HAP Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHS and HAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DHS vs. HAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHS drawdown since its inception was -67.25%, which is greater than HAP's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHS and HAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHSHAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.25%

-50.99%

-16.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.30%

-9.09%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.87%

-16.92%

+5.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.28%

-25.66%

+10.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.35%

-44.07%

+6.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.89%

-5.15%

+3.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.48%

-12.03%

+2.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

3.22%

-1.51%

Volatility

DHS vs. HAP - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) and VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) have volatilities of 3.77% and 3.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHSHAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

3.85%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.84%

12.57%

-4.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

15.70%

-5.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

18.21%

-4.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.10%

19.67%

-3.57%

DHS vs. HAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than HAP's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

DHS vs. HAP - Dividend Comparison

DHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than HAP's 1.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
3.18%3.32%3.66%4.31%3.42%3.29%4.14%3.69%3.76%3.00%3.25%3.53%
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
1.93%2.27%2.65%3.27%3.28%2.16%2.45%2.80%2.85%2.02%1.99%3.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DHS and HAP have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAP has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to DHS (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHS dropped -67.25% vs HAP's -50.99%.

On 10-year performance, HAP leads with 11.28% vs 9.67% for DHS. On fees, DHS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HAP has performed better with a 11.28% return vs 9.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DHS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for HAP.

DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 1.93% for HAP.

DHS is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while HAP is Energy Equities. DHS tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index, while HAP tracks MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DHS and 0.42% for HAP.

DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHS and HAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer