PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHR vs. CNQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DHR vs. CNQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Danaher Corporation (DHR) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DHR is traded in USD, while CNQ.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CNQ.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHR achieves a -21.16% return, which is significantly lower than CNQ.TO's 34.74% return. Over the past 10 years, DHR has underperformed CNQ.TO with an annualized return of 11.06%, while CNQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 22.36% annualized return.


DHR

1D
-0.38%
1M
8.50%
YTD
-21.16%
6M
-20.15%
1Y
-11.58%
3Y*
-5.06%
5Y*
-3.39%
10Y*
11.06%

CNQ.TO

1D
-0.48%
1M
-4.02%
YTD
34.74%
6M
38.66%
1Y
44.24%
3Y*
25.10%
5Y*
30.02%
10Y*
22.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DHR vs. CNQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DHR
Danaher Corporation
-21.16%0.35%-0.35%-1.22%-19.02%48.57%45.34%49.55%11.80%20.01%
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
34.74%15.70%-0.18%30.08%53.38%91.35%-10.82%44.81%-27.46%18.95%

Correlation

The correlation between DHR and CNQ.TO is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006

0.25

The correlation between DHR and CNQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DHR:

$128.09B

CNQ.TO:

CA$132.89B

EPS

DHR:

$5.17

CNQ.TO:

CA$4.65

PE Ratio

DHR:

34.85

CNQ.TO:

13.64

PS Ratio

DHR:

5.19

CNQ.TO:

3.34

PB Ratio

DHR:

2.42

CNQ.TO:

2.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

DHR:

$24.78B

CNQ.TO:

CA$39.61B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DHR:

$15.04B

CNQ.TO:

CA$12.42B

EBITDA (TTM)

DHR:

$6.69B

CNQ.TO:

CA$17.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHR vs. CNQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DHR
DHR Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
DHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHR Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
DHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHR Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

CNQ.TO
CNQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
CNQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DHR vs. CNQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Danaher Corporation (DHR) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DHRCNQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.26

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

3.08

-3.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.84

6.83

-7.67

DHR vs. CNQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHR Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the CNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHR and CNQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DHR vs. CNQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHR drawdown since its inception was -45.80%, smaller than the maximum CNQ.TO drawdown of -76.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHR and CNQ.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHRCNQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.80%

-76.64%

+30.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.97%

-14.43%

-18.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.72%

-36.25%

-5.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.81%

-36.25%

-7.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.81%

-76.64%

+32.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.50%

-9.64%

-27.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

-21.20%

+10.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.85%

6.49%

+7.36%

Volatility

DHR vs. CNQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

Danaher Corporation (DHR) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO) have volatilities of 9.21% and 8.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHRCNQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.21%

8.84%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.52%

24.25%

-4.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.18%

29.57%

-1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.03%

31.39%

-3.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.55%

38.81%

-13.26%

Dividends

DHR vs. CNQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

DHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than CNQ.TO's 3.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
3.77%5.05%6.00%8.53%12.23%7.63%11.35%7.29%8.31%5.00%4.49%6.22%
DHR
Danaher Corporation
0.76%0.56%0.47%12.64%0.38%0.26%0.32%0.44%0.62%0.60%32.55%0.58%

Financials

DHR vs. CNQ.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Danaher Corporation and Canadian Natural Resources Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B20222023202420252026
5.95B
10.81B
(DHR) Total Revenue
(CNQ.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. DHR values in USD, CNQ.TO values in CAD

DHR vs. CNQ.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Danaher Corporation and Canadian Natural Resources Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
60.3%
32.1%
Portfolio components
DHR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaher Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.59B and revenue of 5.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.3%.

CNQ.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a gross profit of 3.47B and revenue of 10.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.1%.

DHR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaher Corporation reported an operating income of 1.34B and revenue of 5.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.6%.

CNQ.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported an operating income of 2.67B and revenue of 10.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.7%.

DHR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaher Corporation reported a net income of 1.03B and revenue of 5.95B, resulting in a net margin of 17.3%.

CNQ.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a net income of 1.35B and revenue of 10.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DHR and CNQ.TO have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHR and CNQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer