PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHF vs. XILSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DHF vs. XILSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional High Yield Fund (DHF) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHF achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly lower than XILSX's 10.56% return.


DHF

1D
1.70%
1M
-0.52%
6M
-2.50%
YTD
0.64%
1Y
1.19%
3Y*
11.27%
5Y*
0.96%
10Y*
5.21%
ALL TIME*
2.97%

XILSX

1D
0.47%
1M
1.42%
6M
8.65%
YTD
10.56%
1Y
24.01%
3Y*
19.19%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$873.57K$687.27K$596.71K
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DHF vs. XILSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DHF
Dimensional High Yield Fund
0.64%5.67%21.12%15.00%-22.70%10.35%6.46%24.68%-11.11%6.52%
XILSX
Pioneer ILS Interval Fund
10.56%18.70%18.93%18.65%1.23%-1.10%7.37%2.60%-2.11%-8.83%

Correlation

The correlation between DHF and XILSX is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHF vs. XILSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DHF
DHF Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
DHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHF Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
DHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHF Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

XILSX
XILSX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
XILSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XILSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
XILSX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
XILSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
XILSX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DHF vs. XILSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional High Yield Fund (DHF) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DHFXILSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-7.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-77.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

41.59

-40.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

229.02

-228.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.35

1,520.09

-1,519.74

DHF vs. XILSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHF Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the XILSX Sharpe Ratio of 7.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHF and XILSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DHF vs. XILSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHF drawdown since its inception was -71.32%, which is greater than XILSX's maximum drawdown of -14.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHF and XILSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHFXILSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.32%

-14.53%

-56.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.66%

-0.10%

-8.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.81%

-2.36%

-9.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.99%

-6.27%

-28.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.55%

0.00%

-3.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.91%

-4.82%

-18.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

0.03%

+3.35%

Volatility

DHF vs. XILSX - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional High Yield Fund (DHF) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX) at 0.67%. This indicates that DHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XILSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHFXILSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

0.67%

+2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.53%

1.62%

+7.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.04%

3.04%

+9.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.99%

3.78%

+11.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.73%

3.90%

+13.83%

DHF vs. XILSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHF has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than XILSX's 1.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

DHF vs. XILSX - Dividend Comparison

DHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.79%, more than XILSX's 8.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHF
Dimensional High Yield Fund
8.79%8.47%8.14%7.86%10.12%8.24%8.60%8.52%10.41%8.98%9.76%11.30%
XILSX
Pioneer ILS Interval Fund
8.60%9.51%13.06%12.82%2.68%2.04%5.20%6.63%6.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DHF and XILSX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DHF has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to XILSX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHF dropped -71.32% vs XILSX's -14.53%.

XILSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.89 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHF and XILSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer