DHF vs. ISD
Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional High Yield Fund (DHF) and PGIM High Yield Bond Fund (ISD).
DHF is managed by Dimensional Fund Advisors. It was launched on Jan 1, 2013. ISD is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Apr 30, 2012.
Performance
DHF vs. ISD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DHF vs. ISD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHF Dimensional High Yield Fund | -0.19% | 5.67% | 21.12% | 15.00% | -22.70% | 10.35% | 6.46% | 24.68% | -11.11% | 8.43% |
ISD PGIM High Yield Bond Fund | -7.71% | 15.63% | 22.05% | 15.05% | -18.42% | 15.72% | 6.66% | 28.41% | -5.03% | 3.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DHF achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly higher than ISD's -7.71% return. Over the past 10 years, DHF has underperformed ISD with an annualized return of 6.48%, while ISD has yielded a comparatively higher 7.39% annualized return.
DHF
- 1D
- 4.27%
- 1M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- -0.19%
- 6M
- -1.76%
- 1Y
- 4.04%
- 3Y*
- 13.00%
- 5Y*
- 3.57%
- 10Y*
- 6.48%
ISD
- 1D
- 4.36%
- 1M
- -9.30%
- YTD
- -7.71%
- 6M
- -4.38%
- 1Y
- 0.94%
- 3Y*
- 12.75%
- 5Y*
- 5.94%
- 10Y*
- 7.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DHF vs. ISD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DHF has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than ISD's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
DHF vs. ISD — Risk / Return Rank
DHF
ISD
DHF vs. ISD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional High Yield Fund (DHF) and PGIM High Yield Bond Fund (ISD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DHF | ISD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.28 | 0.06 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.47 | 0.18 | +0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.03 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.48 | 0.09 | +0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.60 | 0.34 | +1.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DHF | ISD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 | 0.06 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.45 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.51 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.43 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between DHF and ISD is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DHF vs. ISD - Dividend Comparison
DHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.61%, less than ISD's 9.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHF Dimensional High Yield Fund | 8.61% | 8.47% | 8.14% | 7.86% | 10.12% | 8.24% | 8.60% | 8.52% | 10.41% | 8.98% | 9.76% | 11.30% |
ISD PGIM High Yield Bond Fund | 9.57% | 8.71% | 9.21% | 10.23% | 10.61% | 7.85% | 8.40% | 7.86% | 7.89% | 8.46% | 8.28% | 9.64% |
Drawdowns
DHF vs. ISD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHF drawdown since its inception was -71.32%, which is greater than ISD's maximum drawdown of -38.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHF and ISD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHF | ISD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.32% | -38.88% | -32.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.84% | -13.52% | +3.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.82% | -25.45% | -12.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.94% | -38.88% | -4.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.35% | -9.67% | +5.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.15% | -5.56% | -17.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 3.58% | -0.54% |
Volatility
DHF vs. ISD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional High Yield Fund (DHF) is 6.29%, while PGIM High Yield Bond Fund (ISD) has a volatility of 7.95%. This indicates that DHF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DHF | ISD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.29% | 7.95% | -1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.45% | 9.69% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.65% | 15.57% | -0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 13.30% | +2.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.75% | 14.57% | +3.18% |