PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISD vs. RSF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ISD vs. RSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM High Yield Bond Fund (ISD) and RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund (RSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ISD vs. RSF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISD
PGIM High Yield Bond Fund
-7.71%15.63%22.05%15.05%-18.42%15.72%6.66%28.41%-5.03%3.59%
RSF
RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund
4.23%4.62%9.26%9.03%-1.62%27.59%3.10%-12.10%-1.41%5.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISD achieves a -7.71% return, which is significantly lower than RSF's 4.23% return.


ISD

1D
4.36%
1M
-9.30%
YTD
-7.71%
6M
-4.38%
1Y
0.94%
3Y*
12.75%
5Y*
5.94%
10Y*
7.39%

RSF

1D
0.48%
1M
2.27%
YTD
4.23%
6M
4.54%
1Y
7.78%
3Y*
9.74%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ISD vs. RSF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISD has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than RSF's 6.38% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ISD vs. RSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISD
ISD Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
ISD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISD Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISD Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ISD Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISD Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

RSF
RSF Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSF Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSF Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISD vs. RSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM High Yield Bond Fund (ISD) and RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund (RSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISDRSFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.06

0.86

-0.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.18

1.28

-1.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.20

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.09

1.87

-1.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.34

4.42

-4.08

ISD vs. RSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISD Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the RSF Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISD and RSF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISDRSFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

0.86

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.77

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.43

0.00

Correlation

The correlation between ISD and RSF is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ISD vs. RSF - Dividend Comparison

ISD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.57%, less than RSF's 11.21% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISD
PGIM High Yield Bond Fund
9.57%8.71%9.21%10.23%10.61%7.85%8.40%7.86%7.89%8.46%8.28%9.64%
RSF
RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund
11.21%11.30%10.87%10.85%11.78%9.52%11.76%6.92%8.21%9.22%1.41%0.00%

Drawdowns

ISD vs. RSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISD drawdown since its inception was -38.88%, which is greater than RSF's maximum drawdown of -30.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISD and RSF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ISDRSFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.88%

-30.61%

-8.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.52%

-4.23%

-9.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.45%

-10.02%

-15.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.67%

-3.45%

-6.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.56%

-4.63%

-0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

1.79%

+1.79%

Volatility

ISD vs. RSF - Volatility Comparison

PGIM High Yield Bond Fund (ISD) has a higher volatility of 7.95% compared to RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund (RSF) at 6.01%. This indicates that ISD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ISDRSFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.95%

6.01%

+1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

7.30%

+2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.57%

9.07%

+6.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.30%

10.55%

+2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.57%

11.32%

+3.25%