DGZ vs. HDEF
DGZ (DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes) and HDEF (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGZ is a Inverse Commodities fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index - Optimum Yield Gold Excess Return (-100%), while HDEF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DGZ returned -8.68%/yr vs 8.59%/yr for HDEF. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. DGZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for HDEF.
Performance
DGZ vs. HDEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGZ achieves a 2.71% return, which is significantly lower than HDEF's 3.99% return. Over the past 10 years, DGZ has underperformed HDEF with an annualized return of -8.68%, while HDEF has yielded a comparatively higher 8.59% annualized return.
DGZ
- 1D
- 4.82%
- 1M
- 16.59%
- YTD
- 2.71%
- 6M
- 4.61%
- 1Y
- -15.32%
- 3Y*
- -16.62%
- 5Y*
- -10.05%
- 10Y*
- -8.68%
HDEF
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- 3.99%
- 6M
- 6.18%
- 1Y
- 15.90%
- 3Y*
- 16.39%
- 5Y*
- 9.83%
- 10Y*
- 8.59%
DGZ vs. HDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGZ DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes | 2.71% | -32.55% | -16.46% | -4.75% | 4.93% | 1.53% | -20.80% | -13.42% | 4.88% | -11.36% |
HDEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF | 3.99% | 33.01% | 2.85% | 18.53% | -2.51% | 6.95% | -1.90% | 25.02% | -13.74% | 9.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGZ and HDEF is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2015 | -0.10 |
The correlation between DGZ and HDEF shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (5 years) to -0.09 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGZ vs. HDEF — Risk / Return Rank
DGZ
HDEF
DGZ vs. HDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes (DGZ) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGZ | HDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.25 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | 1.99 | -2.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | 6.16 | -6.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGZ | HDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 | 1.37 | -1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | 0.70 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.32 | 0.53 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.31 | 0.45 | -0.76 |
Drawdowns
DGZ vs. HDEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGZ drawdown since its inception was -86.32%, which is greater than HDEF's maximum drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGZ and HDEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGZ | HDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.32% | -36.43% | -49.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.32% | -8.03% | -30.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.54% | -11.15% | -48.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.54% | -23.63% | -37.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.49% | -36.43% | -35.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.41% | -5.69% | -76.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.74% | -5.04% | -52.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.80% | 2.59% | +19.21% |
Volatility
DGZ vs. HDEF - Volatility Comparison
DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes (DGZ) has a higher volatility of 45.00% compared to Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) at 3.75%. This indicates that DGZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGZ | HDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 45.00% | 3.75% | +41.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.96% | 9.20% | +45.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.38% | 11.67% | +54.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.24% | 14.14% | +21.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.40% | 16.24% | +11.16% |
DGZ vs. HDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HDEF's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGZ vs. HDEF - Dividend Comparison
DGZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGZ DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF | 3.65% | 3.88% | 4.53% | 4.38% | 5.41% | 4.76% | 3.93% | 4.20% | 3.55% | 3.38% | 9.53% | 1.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGZ and HDEF have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGZ has higher volatility (45.00%) compared to HDEF (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGZ dropped -86.32% vs HDEF's -36.43%.
On 10-year performance, HDEF leads with 8.59% vs -8.68% for DGZ. On fees, HDEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, HDEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HDEF has performed better with a 8.59% return vs -8.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DGZ.
HDEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 0.00% for DGZ.
DGZ is categorized as Inverse Commodities, while HDEF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. DGZ tracks Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index - Optimum Yield Gold Excess Return (-100%), while HDEF tracks MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield US Dollar Hedged Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DGZ and 0.20% for HDEF.
HDEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGZ and HDEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer