DGZ vs. GLDM
DGZ (DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - DGZ is a Inverse Commodities fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index - Optimum Yield Gold Excess Return (-100%), while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DGZ returned -9.77%/yr vs 16.85%/yr for GLDM. At a correlation of -0.65, they often move in opposite directions. DGZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.
Performance
DGZ vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGZ achieves a 7.37% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's -7.26% return.
DGZ
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- 6.28%
- 6M
- 12.88%
- YTD
- 7.37%
- 1Y
- -11.14%
- 3Y*
- -15.55%
- 5Y*
- -9.77%
- 10Y*
- -7.63%
GLDM
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- -4.98%
- 6M
- -12.90%
- YTD
- -7.26%
- 1Y
- 19.09%
- 3Y*
- 26.87%
- 5Y*
- 16.85%
- 10Y*
- —
DGZ vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGZ DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes | 7.37% | -32.55% | -16.46% | -4.75% | 4.93% | 1.53% | -20.80% | -13.42% | 0.48% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | -7.26% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 18.10% | 1.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGZ and GLDM is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018 | -0.65 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DGZ and GLDM has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.65 to -0.37, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGZ vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank
DGZ
GLDM
DGZ vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes (DGZ) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGZ | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.15 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 0.73 | -1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.55 | 1.80 | -2.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGZ vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGZ drawdown since its inception was -86.32%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -26.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGZ and GLDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGZ | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.32% | -26.11% | -60.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.14% | -26.11% | -10.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.54% | -26.11% | -33.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.54% | -26.11% | -35.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.61% | -25.85% | -55.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.86% | -6.43% | -51.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.16% | 10.63% | +9.53% |
Volatility
DGZ vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes (DGZ) has a higher volatility of 24.11% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 7.60%. This indicates that DGZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGZ | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.11% | 7.60% | +16.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.97% | 24.04% | +34.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.25% | 27.76% | +42.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.88% | 18.30% | +18.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.40% | 17.07% | +11.33% |
DGZ vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGZ vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
Neither DGZ nor GLDM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DGZ and GLDM have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGZ has higher volatility (24.11%) compared to GLDM (7.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGZ dropped -86.32% vs GLDM's -26.11%.
On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 16.85% vs -9.77% for DGZ. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GLDM has been the lower-risk option at 7.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 16.85% return vs -9.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DGZ.
DGZ and GLDM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DGZ is categorized as Inverse Commodities, while GLDM is Gold. DGZ tracks Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index - Optimum Yield Gold Excess Return (-100%), while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DGZ and 0.10% for GLDM.
GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGZ and GLDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer