DGTSX vs. QBDSX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX).
DGTSX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Dec 23, 2003. QBDSX is managed by Advisors Preferred. It was launched on Aug 8, 2013.
Performance
DGTSX vs. QBDSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DGTSX vs. QBDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGTSX DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio | 0.31% | 8.39% | 7.43% | 8.93% | -8.06% | 10.20% | 7.29% | 9.80% | -1.85% | 5.83% |
QBDSX Quantified Managed Income Fund | -0.38% | 5.11% | 1.02% | 2.25% | -4.09% | -0.66% | -9.22% | 10.50% | -3.17% | 5.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGTSX achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly higher than QBDSX's -0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, DGTSX has outperformed QBDSX with an annualized return of 4.91%, while QBDSX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.87% annualized return.
DGTSX
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -1.72%
- YTD
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 1.58%
- 1Y
- 8.01%
- 3Y*
- 7.34%
- 5Y*
- 4.76%
- 10Y*
- 4.91%
QBDSX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- -0.38%
- 6M
- -1.53%
- 1Y
- 2.25%
- 3Y*
- 2.73%
- 5Y*
- 0.90%
- 10Y*
- 0.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DGTSX vs. QBDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGTSX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than QBDSX's 1.31% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DGTSX vs. QBDSX — Risk / Return Rank
DGTSX
QBDSX
DGTSX vs. QBDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGTSX | QBDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.94 | 0.60 | +1.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.78 | 0.87 | +1.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.11 | +0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 0.89 | +1.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.98 | 3.43 | +7.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGTSX | QBDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 0.60 | +1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.21 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | 0.17 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.15 | +0.75 |
Correlation
The correlation between DGTSX and QBDSX is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DGTSX vs. QBDSX - Dividend Comparison
DGTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than QBDSX's 4.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGTSX DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio | 5.92% | 5.54% | 7.28% | 4.75% | 2.77% | 7.62% | 2.12% | 2.57% | 2.99% | 1.25% | 1.26% | 1.50% |
QBDSX Quantified Managed Income Fund | 4.49% | 4.47% | 3.98% | 4.51% | 0.54% | 0.71% | 0.87% | 2.26% | 2.04% | 2.51% | 1.00% | 3.89% |
Drawdowns
DGTSX vs. QBDSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGTSX drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, smaller than the maximum QBDSX drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGTSX and QBDSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGTSX | QBDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.71% | -18.38% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.11% | -3.09% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.26% | -7.40% | -3.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.26% | -18.38% | +7.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.92% | -8.41% | +6.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.66% | -6.83% | +5.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.70% | 0.80% | -0.10% |
Volatility
DGTSX vs. QBDSX - Volatility Comparison
DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) has a higher volatility of 1.58% compared to Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) at 1.40%. This indicates that DGTSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QBDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DGTSX | QBDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.58% | 1.40% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.53% | 2.77% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.25% | 3.77% | +0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.94% | 4.32% | +1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.22% | 5.26% | -0.04% |