PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGT vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGT vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGT achieves a 12.72% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 2.92% return. Over the past 10 years, DGT has outperformed GLD with an annualized return of 14.09%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively lower 13.12% annualized return.


DGT

1D
-0.58%
1M
5.01%
YTD
12.72%
6M
14.40%
1Y
30.90%
3Y*
22.91%
5Y*
13.59%
10Y*
14.09%

GLD

1D
-0.99%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
2.92%
6M
5.43%
1Y
32.04%
3Y*
31.09%
5Y*
18.15%
10Y*
13.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGT vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGT
State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF
12.72%30.04%14.15%20.95%-8.00%21.50%9.67%22.19%-9.65%24.87%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
2.92%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between DGT and GLD is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2004

0.14

The correlation between DGT and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DGT vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGT
GLD

Technology

17.7%

-

Financial Services

17.1%

-

Industrials

13.9%

-

Healthcare

10.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%

-

Energy

7.1%

-

Basic Materials

7.1%
100.0%

Communication Services

6.0%

-

Utilities

3.8%

-

Real Estate

1.4%

-

Technology

DGT
17.7%
GLD

-

Financial Services

DGT
17.1%
GLD

-

Industrials

DGT
13.9%
GLD

-

Healthcare

DGT
10.9%
GLD

-

Consumer Defensive

DGT
7.6%
GLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

DGT
7.5%
GLD

-

Energy

DGT
7.1%
GLD

-

Basic Materials

DGT
7.1%
GLD
100.0%

Communication Services

DGT
6.0%
GLD

-

Utilities

DGT
3.8%
GLD

-

Real Estate

DGT
1.4%
GLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGT vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGT
DGT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGT Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGT vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGTGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.24

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

1.68

+2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.02

4.15

+10.87

DGT vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGT Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGT and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGTGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

1.21

+1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

1.01

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.83

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.60

-0.31

Drawdowns

DGT vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGT drawdown since its inception was -55.36%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGT and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGTGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.36%

-45.56%

-9.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.38%

-19.21%

+10.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.67%

-19.21%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.18%

-21.03%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.40%

-22.00%

-12.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-17.75%

+17.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.83%

-16.16%

+2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

7.73%

-5.67%

Volatility

DGT vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) is 3.94%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that DGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGTGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

5.51%

-1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.54%

23.16%

-13.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.98%

26.61%

-14.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.16%

18.00%

-2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.95%

15.95%

+1.00%

DGT vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGT vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

DGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGT
State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF
2.52%2.78%2.83%2.53%3.15%2.66%1.97%2.76%2.50%1.93%2.31%2.37%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGT and GLD have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLD has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to DGT (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGT dropped -55.36% vs GLD's -45.56%.

On 10-year performance, DGT leads with 14.09% vs 13.12% for GLD. On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, DGT has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGT has performed better with a 14.09% return vs 13.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DGT.

DGT has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

DGT is categorized as Global Equities, while GLD is Gold. DGT tracks The Global Dow, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DGT and 0.40% for GLD.

DGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGT and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer