PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGT vs. FIXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGT vs. FIXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGT achieves a 10.92% return, which is significantly higher than FIXT's 0.71% return.


DGT

1D
-1.17%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
10.92%
6M
10.57%
1Y
28.50%
3Y*
21.71%
5Y*
13.70%
10Y*
14.42%

FIXT

1D
0.14%
1M
1.07%
YTD
0.71%
6M
0.66%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGT vs. FIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DGT and FIXT is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025

0.39

DGT vs. FIXT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGT
FIXT

Technology

20.4%

-

Financial Services

16.7%

-

Industrials

13.5%

-

Healthcare

10.7%
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%

-

Basic Materials

7.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.1%

-

Energy

6.3%

-

Communication Services

5.9%

-

Utilities

3.4%

-

Real Estate

1.4%

-

Technology

DGT
20.4%
FIXT

-

Financial Services

DGT
16.7%
FIXT

-

Industrials

DGT
13.5%
FIXT

-

Healthcare

DGT
10.7%
FIXT
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DGT
7.4%
FIXT

-

Basic Materials

DGT
7.2%
FIXT

-

Consumer Defensive

DGT
7.1%
FIXT

-

Energy

DGT
6.3%
FIXT

-

Communication Services

DGT
5.9%
FIXT

-

Utilities

DGT
3.4%
FIXT

-

Real Estate

DGT
1.4%
FIXT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGT vs. FIXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGT
DGT Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGT Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FIXT
FIXT Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGT vs. FIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGTFIXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.22

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

1.56

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.69

4.33

+9.36

DGT vs. FIXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGT Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the FIXT Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGT and FIXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGT vs. FIXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGT drawdown since its inception was -55.36%, which is greater than FIXT's maximum drawdown of -3.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGT and FIXT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGTFIXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.36%

-3.02%

-52.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.38%

-3.02%

-5.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.39%

-1.42%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.80%

-0.75%

-13.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

1.08%

+1.01%

Volatility

DGT vs. FIXT - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) at 0.91%. This indicates that DGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGTFIXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

0.91%

+3.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

2.48%

+7.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.51%

3.77%

+8.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.23%

3.74%

+11.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.84%

3.74%

+13.10%

DGT vs. FIXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FIXT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGT vs. FIXT - Dividend Comparison

DGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than FIXT's 5.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGT
State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF
2.53%2.78%2.83%2.53%3.15%2.66%1.97%2.76%2.50%1.93%2.31%2.37%
FIXT
Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF
5.52%3.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGT and FIXT have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGT has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to FIXT (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGT dropped -55.36% vs FIXT's -3.02%.

On 1-year performance, DGT leads with 28.50% vs 4.69% for FIXT. On fees, DGT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FIXT has been the lower-risk option at 0.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DGT has performed better with a 28.50% return vs 4.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FIXT.

FIXT has the higher dividend yield at 5.52%, compared with 2.53% for DGT.

DGT tracks The Global Dow, while FIXT tracks VettaFi Natural Disaster Response and Mitigation Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Procure. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DGT and 0.75% for FIXT.

DGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGT and FIXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer