DGT vs. AVGV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DGT (State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF) and AVGV (Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF) are both Global Equities funds. DGT is passively managed, while AVGV is actively managed. Over the past year, DGT returned 28.50% vs 35.25% for AVGV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DGT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for AVGV.

Performance

DGT vs. AVGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) and Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGT achieves a 10.92% return, which is significantly lower than AVGV's 16.61% return.

DGT

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: -1.23%
• YTD: 10.92%
• 6M: 10.57%
• 1Y: 28.50%
• 3Y*: 21.71%
• 5Y*: 13.70%
• 10Y*: 14.42%

AVGV

• 1D: -1.36%
• 1M: 0.85%
• YTD: 16.61%
• 6M: 15.61%
• 1Y: 35.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGT vs. AVGV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DGT State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF	10.92%	30.04%	14.15%	8.30%
AVGV Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF	16.61%	22.57%	11.26%	11.88%

Correlation

The correlation between DGT and AVGV is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023	0.92

The correlation between DGT and AVGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

DGT vs. AVGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DGT	AVGV
Technology	20.4%	12.1%
Financial Services	16.7%	21.3%
Industrials	13.5%	16.2%
Healthcare	10.7%	4.5%
Consumer Cyclical	7.4%	14.7%
Basic Materials	7.2%	7.2%
Consumer Defensive	7.1%	5.2%
Energy	6.3%	12.4%
Communication Services	5.9%	5.0%
Utilities	3.4%	0.7%
Real Estate	1.4%	0.7%

Return for Risk

DGT vs. AVGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGT

DGT Risk / Return Rank: 75
DGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
DGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
DGT Omega Ratio Rank: 76
DGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
DGT Martin Ratio Rank: 76

AVGV

AVGV Risk / Return Rank: 84
AVGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
AVGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
AVGV Omega Ratio Rank: 82
AVGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
AVGV Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGT vs. AVGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) and Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DGT	AVGV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	2.64	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	3.64	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.47	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.41	4.36	-0.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.69	16.95	-3.26

DGT vs. AVGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGT Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the AVGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGT and AVGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DGT vs. AVGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGT drawdown since its inception was -55.36%, which is greater than AVGV's maximum drawdown of -17.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGT and AVGV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DGT	AVGV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.36%	-17.03%	-38.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.38%	-8.12%	-0.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.39%	-1.88%	-0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.80%	-2.27%	-11.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	2.09%	0.00%

Volatility

DGT vs. AVGV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) is 4.33%, while Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that DGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DGT	AVGV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.33%	4.56%	-0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.27%	10.46%	-0.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.51%	13.41%	-0.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.23%	15.03%	+0.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.84%	15.03%	+1.81%

DGT vs. AVGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGV's 0.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

DGT vs. AVGV - Dividend Comparison

DGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than AVGV's 2.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AVGV Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF	2.49%	1.98%	2.32%	1.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DGT State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF	2.53%	2.78%	2.83%	2.53%	3.15%	2.66%	1.97%	2.76%	2.50%	1.93%	2.31%	2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DGT and AVGV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, DGT and AVGV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DGT or AVGV?

AVGV has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to DGT (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGT dropped -55.36% vs AVGV's -17.03%.

Which ETF is better, DGT or AVGV?

On 1-year performance, AVGV leads with 35.25% vs 28.50% for DGT. On fees, AVGV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, DGT has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DGT or AVGV?

Over the 1-year period, AVGV has performed better with a 35.25% return vs 28.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DGT or AVGV?

AVGV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DGT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DGT or AVGV?

DGT has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 2.49% for AVGV.

What is the main difference between DGT and AVGV?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DGT and 0.26% for AVGV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.