DGS vs. WTV
DGS (WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund) and WTV (WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DGS is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Index, while WTV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. DGS is passively managed, while WTV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DGS returned 7.67%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for WTV. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DGS charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for WTV.
Performance
DGS vs. WTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGS achieves a 12.85% return, which is significantly higher than WTV's 10.06% return.
DGS
- 1D
- -2.97%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- 12.85%
- 6M
- 13.23%
- 1Y
- 23.97%
- 3Y*
- 15.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
WTV
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 10.06%
- 6M
- 9.41%
- 1Y
- 22.34%
- 3Y*
- 21.29%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- —
DGS vs. WTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGS WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund | 12.85% | 21.18% | 1.13% | 19.08% | -12.35% | 15.33% | 4.06% | 18.90% | -16.52% | 6.43% |
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund | 10.06% | 13.51% | 23.99% | 22.35% | -8.06% | 30.59% | 6.15% | 29.69% | -8.29% | 1.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGS and WTV is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2017 | 0.58 |
The correlation between DGS and WTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGS vs. WTV — Risk / Return Rank
DGS
WTV
DGS vs. WTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) and WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGS | WTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.34 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 3.14 | -0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.88 | 10.16 | -2.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGS vs. WTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGS drawdown since its inception was -61.83%, which is greater than WTV's maximum drawdown of -42.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGS and WTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGS | WTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.83% | -42.18% | -19.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.06% | -7.15% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.31% | -18.49% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.86% | -19.30% | -5.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.33% | -1.54% | -1.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.56% | -5.03% | -7.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 2.20% | +0.85% |
Volatility
DGS vs. WTV - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) has a higher volatility of 7.86% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV) at 3.65%. This indicates that DGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGS | WTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.86% | 3.65% | +4.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.73% | 8.20% | +6.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.88% | 11.90% | +4.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.19% | 17.08% | -1.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 20.16% | -2.83% |
DGS vs. WTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than WTV's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGS vs. WTV - Dividend Comparison
DGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than WTV's 1.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGS WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund | 3.26% | 3.45% | 3.36% | 4.55% | 5.34% | 3.98% | 3.69% | 3.95% | 4.24% | 2.81% | 3.42% | 3.28% |
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund | 1.66% | 1.59% | 1.54% | 1.62% | 2.08% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.44% | 1.94% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGS and WTV have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGS has higher volatility (7.86%) compared to WTV (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGS dropped -61.83% vs WTV's -42.18%.
On 5-year performance, WTV leads with 13.43% vs 7.67% for DGS. On fees, WTV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, WTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, WTV has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 7.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WTV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DGS.
DGS has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 1.66% for WTV.
DGS is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while WTV is Mid Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DGS and 0.12% for WTV.
WTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGS and WTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer