DGS vs. UEVM
DGS (WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund) and UEVM (VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGS is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Index, while UEVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DGS returned 7.85%/yr vs 7.55%/yr for UEVM. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DGS charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for UEVM.
Performance
DGS vs. UEVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGS achieves a 14.53% return, which is significantly higher than UEVM's 8.99% return.
DGS
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 2.58%
- YTD
- 14.53%
- 6M
- 15.57%
- 1Y
- 27.26%
- 3Y*
- 16.17%
- 5Y*
- 7.85%
- 10Y*
- 9.93%
UEVM
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 8.99%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- 1Y
- 24.92%
- 3Y*
- 18.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- —
DGS vs. UEVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGS WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund | 14.53% | 21.18% | 1.13% | 19.08% | -12.35% | 15.33% | 4.06% | 18.90% | -16.52% | 6.80% |
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 8.99% | 22.74% | 11.92% | 17.41% | -14.60% | 11.09% | 3.77% | 10.71% | -16.96% | 3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGS and UEVM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | 0.91 |
The correlation between DGS and UEVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGS vs. UEVM — Risk / Return Rank
DGS
UEVM
DGS vs. UEVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGS | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.30 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 2.56 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.16 | 8.65 | +0.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGS | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | 1.65 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.48 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.33 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
DGS vs. UEVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGS drawdown since its inception was -61.83%, which is greater than UEVM's maximum drawdown of -45.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGS and UEVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGS | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.83% | -45.44% | -16.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.06% | -9.79% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.31% | -18.88% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.86% | -26.98% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -2.18% | +0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.59% | -11.67% | -0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 2.89% | +0.09% |
Volatility
DGS vs. UEVM - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) have volatilities of 5.24% and 5.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGS | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 5.15% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.03% | 12.13% | +0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.56% | 15.18% | +0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.87% | 15.90% | -1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.32% | 18.39% | -1.07% |
DGS vs. UEVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than UEVM's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGS vs. UEVM - Dividend Comparison
DGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, more than UEVM's 3.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGS WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund | 3.21% | 3.45% | 3.36% | 4.55% | 5.34% | 3.98% | 3.69% | 3.95% | 4.24% | 2.81% | 3.42% | 3.28% |
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 3.05% | 4.02% | 5.65% | 4.71% | 3.46% | 4.49% | 2.19% | 2.79% | 2.34% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGS and UEVM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGS has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to UEVM (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGS dropped -61.83% vs UEVM's -45.44%.
On 5-year performance, DGS leads with 7.85% vs 7.55% for UEVM. On fees, UEVM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DGS has performed better with a 7.85% return vs 7.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UEVM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DGS.
DGS has the higher dividend yield at 3.21%, compared with 3.05% for UEVM.
DGS is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while UEVM is Momentum. DGS tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Index, while UEVM tracks Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DGS and 0.45% for UEVM.
DGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGS and UEVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer