PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGS vs. UEVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGS vs. UEVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGS achieves a 14.53% return, which is significantly higher than UEVM's 8.99% return.


DGS

1D
-1.37%
1M
2.58%
YTD
14.53%
6M
15.57%
1Y
27.26%
3Y*
16.17%
5Y*
7.85%
10Y*
9.93%

UEVM

1D
-1.86%
1M
0.77%
YTD
8.99%
6M
8.31%
1Y
24.92%
3Y*
18.34%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGS vs. UEVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
14.53%21.18%1.13%19.08%-12.35%15.33%4.06%18.90%-16.52%6.80%
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
8.99%22.74%11.92%17.41%-14.60%11.09%3.77%10.71%-16.96%3.70%

Correlation

The correlation between DGS and UEVM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.91

The correlation between DGS and UEVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGS vs. UEVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGS
DGS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
DGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGS Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGS Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

UEVM
UEVM Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
UEVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEVM Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
UEVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEVM Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGS vs. UEVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGSUEVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.30

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

2.56

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.16

8.65

+0.51

DGS vs. UEVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGS Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the UEVM Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGS and UEVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGSUEVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

1.65

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.48

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.33

-0.10

Drawdowns

DGS vs. UEVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGS drawdown since its inception was -61.83%, which is greater than UEVM's maximum drawdown of -45.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGS and UEVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGSUEVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.83%

-45.44%

-16.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.06%

-9.79%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.31%

-18.88%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.86%

-26.98%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-2.18%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.59%

-11.67%

-0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

2.89%

+0.09%

Volatility

DGS vs. UEVM - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) have volatilities of 5.24% and 5.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGSUEVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

5.15%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.03%

12.13%

+0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.56%

15.18%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.87%

15.90%

-1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.32%

18.39%

-1.07%

DGS vs. UEVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than UEVM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGS vs. UEVM - Dividend Comparison

DGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, more than UEVM's 3.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
3.21%3.45%3.36%4.55%5.34%3.98%3.69%3.95%4.24%2.81%3.42%3.28%
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
3.05%4.02%5.65%4.71%3.46%4.49%2.19%2.79%2.34%0.79%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGS and UEVM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGS has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to UEVM (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGS dropped -61.83% vs UEVM's -45.44%.

On 5-year performance, DGS leads with 7.85% vs 7.55% for UEVM. On fees, UEVM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DGS has performed better with a 7.85% return vs 7.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UEVM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DGS.

DGS has the higher dividend yield at 3.21%, compared with 3.05% for UEVM.

DGS is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while UEVM is Momentum. DGS tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Index, while UEVM tracks Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DGS and 0.45% for UEVM.

DGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGS and UEVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer