DGS vs. IMOM
DGS (WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund) and IMOM (Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGS is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Index, while IMOM is a Momentum fund tracking the Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DGS returned 9.93%/yr vs 7.93%/yr for IMOM. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DGS charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IMOM.
Performance
DGS vs. IMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGS achieves a 14.53% return, which is significantly lower than IMOM's 18.05% return. Over the past 10 years, DGS has outperformed IMOM with an annualized return of 9.93%, while IMOM has yielded a comparatively lower 7.93% annualized return.
DGS
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 2.58%
- YTD
- 14.53%
- 6M
- 15.57%
- 1Y
- 27.26%
- 3Y*
- 16.17%
- 5Y*
- 7.85%
- 10Y*
- 9.93%
IMOM
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 2.41%
- YTD
- 18.05%
- 6M
- 22.47%
- 1Y
- 42.66%
- 3Y*
- 25.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.44%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
DGS vs. IMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGS WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund | 14.53% | 21.18% | 1.13% | 19.08% | -12.35% | 15.33% | 4.06% | 18.90% | -16.52% | 37.47% |
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF | 18.05% | 47.20% | 5.22% | 9.15% | -21.92% | -0.75% | 28.39% | 18.26% | -23.07% | 34.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGS and IMOM is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016 | 0.61 |
The correlation between DGS and IMOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGS vs. IMOM — Risk / Return Rank
DGS
IMOM
DGS vs. IMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) and Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGS | IMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.40 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 2.75 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.16 | 11.57 | -2.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGS | IMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | 2.20 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.43 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.39 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.40 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
DGS vs. IMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGS drawdown since its inception was -61.83%, which is greater than IMOM's maximum drawdown of -45.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGS and IMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGS | IMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.83% | -45.74% | -16.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.06% | -15.61% | +5.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.31% | -17.51% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.86% | -39.27% | +14.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.08% | -45.74% | +1.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -2.45% | +1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.59% | -14.18% | +1.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 3.70% | -0.72% |
Volatility
DGS vs. IMOM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) is 5.24%, while Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) has a volatility of 6.44%. This indicates that DGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGS | IMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 6.44% | -1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.03% | 16.74% | -3.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.56% | 19.50% | -3.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.87% | 19.85% | -4.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.32% | 20.20% | -2.88% |
DGS vs. IMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than IMOM's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGS vs. IMOM - Dividend Comparison
DGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, more than IMOM's 2.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGS WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund | 3.21% | 3.45% | 3.36% | 4.55% | 5.34% | 3.98% | 3.69% | 3.95% | 4.24% | 2.81% | 3.42% | 3.28% |
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF | 2.14% | 2.53% | 4.52% | 2.95% | 6.06% | 1.27% | 0.59% | 1.17% | 0.78% | 1.11% | 0.54% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGS and IMOM have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMOM has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to DGS (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGS dropped -61.83% vs IMOM's -45.74%.
On 10-year performance, DGS leads with 9.93% vs 7.93% for IMOM. On fees, IMOM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DGS has performed better with a 9.93% return vs 7.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IMOM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DGS.
DGS has the higher dividend yield at 3.21%, compared with 2.14% for IMOM.
DGS is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while IMOM is Momentum. DGS tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Index, while IMOM tracks Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR). They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DGS and 0.38% for IMOM.
IMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGS and IMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer