PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGS vs. IEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGS vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGS achieves a 14.53% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 26.21% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DGS having a 9.93% annualized return and IEMG not far ahead at 10.41%.


DGS

1D
-1.37%
1M
2.58%
YTD
14.53%
6M
15.57%
1Y
27.26%
3Y*
16.17%
5Y*
7.85%
10Y*
9.93%

IEMG

1D
-1.34%
1M
7.97%
YTD
26.21%
6M
28.63%
1Y
52.58%
3Y*
23.55%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
10.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGS vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
14.53%21.18%1.13%19.08%-12.35%15.33%4.06%18.90%-16.52%37.47%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
26.21%32.56%6.50%11.52%-19.98%-0.64%17.87%17.81%-14.92%37.38%

Correlation

The correlation between DGS and IEMG is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012

0.92

The correlation between DGS and IEMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGS vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGS
DGS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
DGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGS Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGS Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGS vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGSIEMGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.76

2.72

-0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.43

3.53

-1.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.50

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

4.00

-1.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.16

15.38

-6.22

DGS vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGS Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGS and IEMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGSIEMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

2.72

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.41

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.52

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.35

-0.13

Drawdowns

DGS vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGS drawdown since its inception was -61.83%, which is greater than IEMG's maximum drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGS and IEMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGSIEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.83%

-38.71%

-23.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.06%

-13.21%

+3.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.31%

-17.21%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.86%

-35.83%

+10.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.08%

-38.71%

-5.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-1.34%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.59%

-12.97%

+0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

3.43%

-0.45%

Volatility

DGS vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) is 5.24%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 8.31%. This indicates that DGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGSIEMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

8.31%

-3.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.03%

16.93%

-3.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.56%

19.43%

-3.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.87%

18.38%

-3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.32%

20.03%

-2.71%

DGS vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGS vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

DGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, more than IEMG's 2.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
3.21%3.45%3.36%4.55%5.34%3.98%3.69%3.95%4.24%2.81%3.42%3.28%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.18%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGS and IEMG have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEMG has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to DGS (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGS dropped -61.83% vs IEMG's -38.71%.

On 10-year performance, IEMG leads with 10.41% vs 9.93% for DGS. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IEMG has performed better with a 10.41% return vs 9.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DGS.

DGS has the higher dividend yield at 3.21%, compared with 2.18% for IEMG.

DGS tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Index, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DGS and 0.09% for IEMG.

IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGS and IEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer