PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRW vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRW vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRW achieves a 9.10% return, which is significantly higher than NTSX's 8.62% return.


DGRW

1D
-0.83%
1M
4.06%
YTD
9.10%
6M
8.62%
1Y
20.79%
3Y*
16.64%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
14.15%

NTSX

1D
-1.05%
1M
4.37%
YTD
8.62%
6M
7.83%
1Y
25.27%
3Y*
19.38%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRW vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
9.10%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-9.36%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
8.62%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRW and NTSX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018

0.87

The correlation between DGRW and NTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

DGRW vs. NTSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRW
NTSX

Technology

32.1%
35.1%

Healthcare

12.8%
8.4%

Financial Services

11.3%
12.3%

Communication Services

10.1%
12.5%

Industrials

9.9%
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
5.5%

Energy

5.0%
3.5%

Basic Materials

3.3%
1.4%

Utilities

0.2%
2.1%

Real Estate

-

1.5%

Technology

DGRW
32.1%
NTSX
35.1%

Healthcare

DGRW
12.8%
NTSX
8.4%

Financial Services

DGRW
11.3%
NTSX
12.3%

Communication Services

DGRW
10.1%
NTSX
12.5%

Industrials

DGRW
9.9%
NTSX
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRW
7.1%
NTSX
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

DGRW
6.7%
NTSX
5.5%

Energy

DGRW
5.0%
NTSX
3.5%

Basic Materials

DGRW
3.3%
NTSX
1.4%

Utilities

DGRW
0.2%
NTSX
2.1%

Real Estate

DGRW

-

NTSX
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRW vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRW vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGRWNTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.37

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

2.77

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.03

12.25

-1.22

DGRW vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRW Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRW and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGRWNTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.06

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.57

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.71

+0.14

Drawdowns

DGRW vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRW drawdown since its inception was -32.04%, roughly equal to the maximum NTSX drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRW and NTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGRWNTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.04%

-31.34%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-9.16%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.21%

-16.82%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.27%

-31.34%

+14.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-1.05%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.01%

-6.79%

+3.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

2.07%

-0.18%

Volatility

DGRW vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) is 2.47%, while WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) has a volatility of 3.39%. This indicates that DGRW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGRWNTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

3.39%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.64%

9.58%

-1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.88%

12.31%

-2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.97%

17.04%

-3.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.21%

18.27%

-2.06%

DGRW vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRW has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRW vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

DGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than NTSX's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.27%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.08%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRW and NTSX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTSX has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to DGRW (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRW dropped -32.04% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

On 5-year performance, DGRW leads with 12.17% vs 9.69% for NTSX. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 12.17% return vs 9.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DGRW.

DGRW has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 1.08% for NTSX.

DGRW is categorized as Dividend, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DGRW and 0.20% for NTSX.

DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRW and NTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer