DGRW vs. INCE

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) and INCE (Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF) are both Dividend funds. DGRW is passively managed, while INCE is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DGRW returned 11.78%/yr vs 10.85%/yr for INCE. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DGRW charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for INCE.

Performance

DGRW vs. INCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRW achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly lower than INCE's 12.00% return.

DGRW

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: -1.62%
• YTD: 6.36%
• 6M: 5.72%
• 1Y: 16.86%
• 3Y*: 15.10%
• 5Y*: 11.78%
• 10Y*: 14.14%

INCE

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -0.59%
• YTD: 12.00%
• 6M: 11.92%
• 1Y: 23.98%
• 3Y*: 16.37%
• 5Y*: 10.85%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRW vs. INCE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund	6.36%	12.17%	16.98%	18.66%	-6.33%	24.46%	13.87%	29.54%	-5.38%	26.90%
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF	12.00%	15.92%	10.70%	13.87%	-8.54%	23.36%	12.33%	32.72%	-2.14%	19.66%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRW and INCE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016	0.82

The correlation between DGRW and INCE shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DGRW vs. INCE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DGRW	INCE
Technology	32.1%	10.5%
Healthcare	12.8%	7.1%
Financial Services	11.3%	9.5%
Communication Services	10.1%	4.2%
Industrials	9.9%	16.2%
Consumer Cyclical	7.1%	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	6.7%	15.5%
Energy	5.0%	13.3%
Basic Materials	3.3%	7.5%
Utilities	0.2%	12.6%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

DGRW vs. INCE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRW

DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 48
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 49
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 52

INCE

INCE Risk / Return Rank: 89
INCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
INCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
INCE Omega Ratio Rank: 89
INCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
INCE Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRW vs. INCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DGRW	INCE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	2.85	-1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	4.13	-1.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.52	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.04	4.91	-2.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.67	18.21	-9.54

DGRW vs. INCE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRW Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the INCE Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRW and INCE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DGRW vs. INCE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRW drawdown since its inception was -32.04%, smaller than the maximum INCE drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRW and INCE.

Drawdown Indicators

	DGRW	INCE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.04%	-33.95%	+1.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.30%	-4.90%	-3.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.21%	-14.01%	-2.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.27%	-18.40%	+1.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.32%	-1.77%	-1.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.01%	-3.24%	+0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	1.32%	+0.63%

Volatility

DGRW vs. INCE - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) at 2.76%. This indicates that DGRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INCE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DGRW	INCE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.75%	2.76%	+0.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.26%	6.18%	+2.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.30%	8.46%	+1.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.01%	13.28%	+0.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.21%	15.66%	+0.55%

DGRW vs. INCE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRW has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than INCE's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

DGRW vs. INCE - Dividend Comparison

DGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than INCE's 4.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund	1.30%	1.43%	1.55%	1.74%	2.15%	1.78%	1.93%	2.20%	2.42%	1.71%	2.13%	2.18%
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF	4.78%	4.71%	3.25%	1.75%	1.68%	1.41%	1.40%	1.31%	1.55%	1.44%	0.50%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DGRW and INCE in my portfolio?

DGRW and INCE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DGRW or INCE?

DGRW has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to INCE (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRW dropped -32.04% vs INCE's -33.95%.

Which ETF is better, DGRW or INCE?

On 5-year performance, DGRW leads with 11.78% vs 10.85% for INCE. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, INCE has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DGRW or INCE?

Over the 5-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 11.78% return vs 10.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DGRW or INCE?

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for INCE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DGRW or INCE?

INCE has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 1.30% for DGRW.

What is the main difference between DGRW and INCE?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DGRW and 0.29% for INCE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.