DGRW vs. HDLB
DGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) and HDLB (ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRW is a Dividend fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index, while HDLB is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive US High Dividend Low Volatility (USD)(TR) (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DGRW returned 12.17%/yr vs 11.24%/yr for HDLB. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DGRW charges 0.28%/yr vs 1.65%/yr for HDLB.
Performance
DGRW vs. HDLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRW achieves a 9.10% return, which is significantly lower than HDLB's 9.69% return.
DGRW
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 4.06%
- YTD
- 9.10%
- 6M
- 8.62%
- 1Y
- 20.79%
- 3Y*
- 16.64%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 14.15%
HDLB
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- -4.18%
- YTD
- 9.69%
- 6M
- 8.78%
- 1Y
- 17.78%
- 3Y*
- 26.82%
- 5Y*
- 11.24%
- 10Y*
- —
DGRW vs. HDLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 9.10% | 12.17% | 16.98% | 18.66% | -6.33% | 24.46% | 13.87% | 6.25% |
HDLB ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B | 9.69% | 27.26% | 28.21% | -4.12% | -11.46% | 62.67% | -50.94% | 7.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRW and HDLB is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2019 | 0.61 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DGRW and HDLB has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRW vs. HDLB — Risk / Return Rank
DGRW
HDLB
DGRW vs. HDLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGRW | HDLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.13 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 1.23 | +1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.03 | 2.69 | +8.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGRW | HDLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 0.68 | +1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 0.37 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.10 | +0.76 |
Drawdowns
DGRW vs. HDLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRW drawdown since its inception was -32.04%, smaller than the maximum HDLB drawdown of -78.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRW and HDLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRW | HDLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.04% | -78.70% | +46.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | -14.50% | +6.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.21% | -22.46% | +6.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.27% | -43.81% | +26.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -14.15% | +13.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.01% | -27.47% | +24.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 6.62% | -4.73% |
Volatility
DGRW vs. HDLB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) is 2.47%, while ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) has a volatility of 6.21%. This indicates that DGRW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRW | HDLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.47% | 6.21% | -3.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.64% | 18.14% | -10.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.88% | 26.46% | -16.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.97% | 30.55% | -16.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 43.58% | -27.37% |
DGRW vs. HDLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRW has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than HDLB's 1.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGRW vs. HDLB - Dividend Comparison
DGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than HDLB's 12.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.27% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.74% | 2.15% | 1.78% | 1.93% | 2.20% | 2.42% | 1.71% | 2.13% | 2.18% |
HDLB ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B | 12.13% | 12.20% | 10.09% | 12.36% | 10.86% | 8.07% | 16.23% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRW and HDLB have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDLB has higher volatility (6.21%) compared to DGRW (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRW dropped -32.04% vs HDLB's -78.70%.
On 5-year performance, DGRW leads with 12.17% vs 11.24% for HDLB. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 12.17% return vs 11.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 1.65% for HDLB.
HDLB has the higher dividend yield at 12.13%, compared with 1.27% for DGRW.
DGRW is categorized as Dividend, while HDLB is Leveraged Equities. DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index, while HDLB tracks Solactive US High Dividend Low Volatility (USD)(TR) (200%). They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DGRW and 1.65% for HDLB.
DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGRW and HDLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer