PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRW vs. GDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRW vs. GDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRW achieves a 9.87% return, which is significantly lower than GDE's 11.25% return.


DGRW

1D
0.71%
1M
4.18%
YTD
9.87%
6M
9.49%
1Y
21.83%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
12.33%
10Y*
14.19%

GDE

1D
1.33%
1M
2.08%
YTD
11.25%
6M
13.51%
1Y
54.50%
3Y*
47.08%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRW vs. GDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
9.87%12.17%16.98%18.66%-1.66%
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
11.25%73.76%44.79%33.85%-18.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRW and GDE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022

0.60

The correlation between DGRW and GDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRW vs. GDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

GDE
GDE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
GDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDE Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
GDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRW vs. GDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGRWGDEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.35

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

2.42

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.58

7.50

+4.08

DGRW vs. GDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRW Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the GDE Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRW and GDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGRWGDEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

1.93

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

1.17

-0.31

Drawdowns

DGRW vs. GDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRW drawdown since its inception was -32.04%, roughly equal to the maximum GDE drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRW and GDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGRWGDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.04%

-32.01%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-22.66%

+14.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.21%

-22.66%

+6.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-9.99%

+9.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.01%

-7.89%

+4.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

7.29%

-5.40%

Volatility

DGRW vs. GDE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) is 2.49%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that DGRW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGRWGDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

6.68%

-4.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.67%

24.27%

-16.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.89%

28.41%

-18.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.97%

26.12%

-12.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.21%

26.12%

-9.91%

DGRW vs. GDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRW has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than GDE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRW vs. GDE - Dividend Comparison

DGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than GDE's 3.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.26%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
3.88%4.32%7.14%2.22%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRW and GDE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDE has higher volatility (6.68%) compared to DGRW (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRW dropped -32.04% vs GDE's -32.01%.

On 3-year performance, GDE leads with 47.08% vs 17.10% for DGRW. On fees, GDE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 2.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GDE has performed better with a 47.08% return vs 17.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DGRW.

GDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.88%, compared with 1.26% for DGRW.

DGRW is categorized as Dividend, while GDE is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DGRW and 0.20% for GDE.

DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRW and GDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer