DGRS vs. TCV
DGRS (WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund) and TCV (Towle Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. DGRS is passively managed, while TCV is actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DGRS charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for TCV.
Performance
DGRS vs. TCV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRS achieves a 20.85% return, which is significantly lower than TCV's 28.69% return.
DGRS
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- 6M
- 14.50%
- YTD
- 20.85%
- 1Y
- 27.74%
- 3Y*
- 13.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.63%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
TCV
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- 6M
- 15.68%
- YTD
- 28.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGRS vs. TCV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DGRS WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 20.85% | 5.05% |
TCV Towle Value ETF | 28.69% | 2.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRS and TCV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRS vs. TCV — Risk / Return Rank
DGRS
TCV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DGRS vs. TCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) and Towle Value ETF (TCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGRS | TCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.92 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGRS vs. TCV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRS drawdown since its inception was -44.83%, which is greater than TCV's maximum drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRS and TCV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRS | TCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.83% | -12.23% | -32.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -0.09% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.68% | -3.30% | -3.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | — | — |
Volatility
DGRS vs. TCV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRS | TCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.47% | 21.16% | -3.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.32% | 21.16% | -0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.57% | 21.16% | +2.41% |
DGRS vs. TCV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than TCV's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGRS vs. TCV - Dividend Comparison
DGRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than TCV's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRS WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 2.03% | 2.68% | 2.15% | 2.36% | 2.88% | 2.19% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.64% | 1.90% | 1.82% | 2.55% |
TCV Towle Value ETF | 0.56% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRS and TCV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DGRS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DGRS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TCV.
DGRS has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 0.56% for TCV.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Towle. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DGRS and 0.85% for TCV.
Find the right allocation for DGRS and TCV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer