PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRS vs. GDMN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRS vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRS achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -4.13% return.


DGRS

1D
-1.02%
1M
0.29%
YTD
13.56%
6M
12.71%
1Y
25.18%
3Y*
13.73%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
9.61%

GDMN

1D
-3.68%
1M
-2.43%
YTD
-4.13%
6M
2.73%
1Y
76.93%
3Y*
60.95%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRS vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DGRS
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
13.56%-0.43%10.40%21.16%-13.11%3.56%
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
-4.13%237.09%28.23%12.97%-14.62%5.11%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRS and GDMN is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021

0.21

DGRS vs. GDMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRS
GDMN

Financial Services

24.8%

-

Industrials

19.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

16.5%

-

Energy

12.0%

-

Technology

8.7%

-

Basic Materials

7.6%
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%

-

Communication Services

2.0%

-

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Healthcare

1.3%

-

Utilities

0.2%

-

Financial Services

DGRS
24.8%
GDMN

-

Industrials

DGRS
19.0%
GDMN

-

Consumer Cyclical

DGRS
16.5%
GDMN

-

Energy

DGRS
12.0%
GDMN

-

Technology

DGRS
8.7%
GDMN

-

Basic Materials

DGRS
7.6%
GDMN
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

DGRS
6.3%
GDMN

-

Communication Services

DGRS
2.0%
GDMN

-

Real Estate

DGRS
1.7%
GDMN

-

Healthcare

DGRS
1.3%
GDMN

-

Utilities

DGRS
0.2%
GDMN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRS vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRS
DGRS Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DGRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRS Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRS Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

GDMN
GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRS vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGRSGDMNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.25

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

1.98

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.01

4.68

+3.33

DGRS vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRS Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRS and GDMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGRSGDMNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

1.26

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.80

-0.40

Drawdowns

DGRS vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRS drawdown since its inception was -44.83%, smaller than the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRS and GDMN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGRSGDMNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.83%

-52.82%

+7.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-39.03%

+29.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.57%

-39.03%

+11.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-37.06%

+35.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.73%

-18.89%

+12.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

16.51%

-13.36%

Volatility

DGRS vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) is 4.46%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 17.94%. This indicates that DGRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGRSGDMNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

17.94%

-13.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.36%

51.79%

-40.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.03%

61.32%

-43.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.43%

47.59%

-27.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.63%

47.59%

-23.96%

DGRS vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRS vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

DGRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than GDMN's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRS
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
2.23%2.68%2.15%2.36%2.88%2.19%2.32%2.39%2.64%1.90%1.82%2.55%
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
2.82%2.70%9.44%7.69%1.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRS and GDMN have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDMN has higher volatility (17.94%) compared to DGRS (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRS dropped -44.83% vs GDMN's -52.82%.

On 3-year performance, GDMN leads with 60.95% vs 13.73% for DGRS. On fees, DGRS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DGRS has been the lower-risk option at 4.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 60.95% return vs 13.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GDMN.

GDMN has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 2.23% for DGRS.

DGRS is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while GDMN is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DGRS and 0.45% for GDMN.

DGRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRS and GDMN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer