DGRS vs. BSVO
DGRS (WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund) and BSVO (EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. DGRS is passively managed, while BSVO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DGRS returned 13.73%/yr vs 18.56%/yr for BSVO. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DGRS charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for BSVO.
Performance
DGRS vs. BSVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRS achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly lower than BSVO's 18.09% return.
DGRS
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 13.56%
- 6M
- 12.71%
- 1Y
- 25.18%
- 3Y*
- 13.73%
- 5Y*
- 5.89%
- 10Y*
- 9.61%
BSVO
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 18.09%
- 6M
- 17.20%
- 1Y
- 41.30%
- 3Y*
- 18.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGRS vs. BSVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRS WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 13.56% | -0.43% | 10.40% | 18.89% |
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | 18.09% | 9.21% | 4.68% | 22.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRS and BSVO is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2023 | 0.95 |
The correlation between DGRS and BSVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
DGRS vs. BSVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGRS
BSVO
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
Utilities
-
Financial Services
DGRS
BSVO
Industrials
DGRS
BSVO
Consumer Cyclical
DGRS
BSVO
Energy
DGRS
BSVO
Technology
DGRS
BSVO
Basic Materials
DGRS
BSVO
Consumer Defensive
DGRS
BSVO
Communication Services
DGRS
BSVO
Real Estate
DGRS
BSVO
Healthcare
DGRS
BSVO
Utilities
DGRS
BSVO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRS vs. BSVO — Risk / Return Rank
DGRS
BSVO
DGRS vs. BSVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) and EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGRS | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.38 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 4.99 | -2.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.01 | 14.22 | -6.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGRS | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 2.21 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.78 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
DGRS vs. BSVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRS drawdown since its inception was -44.83%, which is greater than BSVO's maximum drawdown of -28.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRS and BSVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRS | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.83% | -28.67% | -16.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -8.31% | -1.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.57% | -28.67% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | -1.86% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.73% | -5.73% | -1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 2.91% | +0.24% |
Volatility
DGRS vs. BSVO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) is 4.46%, while EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that DGRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRS | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.46% | 4.77% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.36% | 11.95% | -0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.03% | 18.88% | -0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.43% | 21.72% | -1.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.63% | 21.72% | +1.91% |
DGRS vs. BSVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than BSVO's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGRS vs. BSVO - Dividend Comparison
DGRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than BSVO's 1.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.29% | 1.52% | 1.61% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DGRS WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 2.23% | 2.68% | 2.15% | 2.36% | 2.88% | 2.19% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.64% | 1.90% | 1.82% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, DGRS and BSVO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BSVO has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to DGRS (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRS dropped -44.83% vs BSVO's -28.67%.
On 3-year performance, BSVO leads with 18.56% vs 13.73% for DGRS. On fees, DGRS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DGRS has been the lower-risk option at 4.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BSVO has performed better with a 18.56% return vs 13.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for BSVO.
DGRS has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 1.29% for BSVO.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Bridgeway. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DGRS and 0.47% for BSVO.
BSVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGRS and BSVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer