PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRS vs. BSVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRS vs. BSVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) and EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRS achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly lower than BSVO's 18.09% return.


DGRS

1D
-1.02%
1M
0.29%
YTD
13.56%
6M
12.71%
1Y
25.18%
3Y*
13.73%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
9.61%

BSVO

1D
-1.86%
1M
0.33%
YTD
18.09%
6M
17.20%
1Y
41.30%
3Y*
18.56%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRS vs. BSVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DGRS
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
13.56%-0.43%10.40%18.89%
BSVO
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF
18.09%9.21%4.68%22.38%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRS and BSVO is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2023

0.95

The correlation between DGRS and BSVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

DGRS vs. BSVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRS
BSVO

Financial Services

24.8%
32.3%

Industrials

19.0%
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

16.5%
14.3%

Energy

12.0%
15.8%

Technology

8.7%
4.9%

Basic Materials

7.6%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
4.8%

Communication Services

2.0%
3.9%

Real Estate

1.7%
0.6%

Healthcare

1.3%
3.6%

Utilities

0.2%

-

Financial Services

DGRS
24.8%
BSVO
32.3%

Industrials

DGRS
19.0%
BSVO
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRS
16.5%
BSVO
14.3%

Energy

DGRS
12.0%
BSVO
15.8%

Technology

DGRS
8.7%
BSVO
4.9%

Basic Materials

DGRS
7.6%
BSVO
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

DGRS
6.3%
BSVO
4.8%

Communication Services

DGRS
2.0%
BSVO
3.9%

Real Estate

DGRS
1.7%
BSVO
0.6%

Healthcare

DGRS
1.3%
BSVO
3.6%

Utilities

DGRS
0.2%
BSVO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRS vs. BSVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRS
DGRS Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DGRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRS Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRS Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

BSVO
BSVO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BSVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSVO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BSVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSVO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRS vs. BSVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) and EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGRSBSVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.38

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

4.99

-2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.01

14.22

-6.22

DGRS vs. BSVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRS Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the BSVO Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRS and BSVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGRSBSVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

2.21

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.78

-0.37

Drawdowns

DGRS vs. BSVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRS drawdown since its inception was -44.83%, which is greater than BSVO's maximum drawdown of -28.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRS and BSVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGRSBSVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.83%

-28.67%

-16.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-8.31%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.57%

-28.67%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-1.86%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.73%

-5.73%

-1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

2.91%

+0.24%

Volatility

DGRS vs. BSVO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) is 4.46%, while EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that DGRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGRSBSVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

4.77%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.36%

11.95%

-0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.03%

18.88%

-0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.43%

21.72%

-1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.63%

21.72%

+1.91%

DGRS vs. BSVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than BSVO's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRS vs. BSVO - Dividend Comparison

DGRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than BSVO's 1.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSVO
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF
1.29%1.52%1.61%1.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DGRS
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
2.23%2.68%2.15%2.36%2.88%2.19%2.32%2.39%2.64%1.90%1.82%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, DGRS and BSVO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BSVO has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to DGRS (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRS dropped -44.83% vs BSVO's -28.67%.

On 3-year performance, BSVO leads with 18.56% vs 13.73% for DGRS. On fees, DGRS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DGRS has been the lower-risk option at 4.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BSVO has performed better with a 18.56% return vs 13.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for BSVO.

DGRS has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 1.29% for BSVO.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Bridgeway. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DGRS and 0.47% for BSVO.

BSVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRS and BSVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer