DGRO vs. YCS
DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DGRO returned 13.30%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for YCS. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DGRO charges 0.08%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
DGRO vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 8.76% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 7.17% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRO has outperformed YCS with an annualized return of 13.30%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively lower 12.34% annualized return.
DGRO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 22.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.30%
YCS
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 7.17%
- 6M
- 10.05%
- 1Y
- 32.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.84%
- 5Y*
- 23.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
DGRO vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 8.76% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.38% | 23.00% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 7.17% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -11.18% | 3.37% | -1.49% | -6.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRO and YCS is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014 | 0.15 |
The correlation between DGRO and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRO vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
DGRO
YCS
DGRO vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGRO | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.35 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 3.97 | -0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.52 | 12.40 | +1.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGRO | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 1.92 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 1.12 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.65 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.33 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
DGRO vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRO | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.10% | -49.56% | +14.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -8.30% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.03% | -23.05% | +9.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.31% | -27.32% | +8.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.10% | -27.32% | -7.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | 0.00% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.44% | -19.93% | +16.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 2.66% | -0.99% |
Volatility
DGRO vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 2.21%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRO | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.21% | 2.75% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.91% | 12.32% | -5.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.48% | 17.27% | -7.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.82% | 21.10% | -7.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 19.01% | -2.39% |
DGRO vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGRO vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.96% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRO and YCS have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YCS has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.30% vs 12.34% for YCS. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.30% return vs 12.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
DGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for DGRO and 1.00% for YCS.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGRO and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer