DGRO vs. QDSIX
DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) and QDSIX (AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund) are both funds - DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while QDSIX is a Multistrategy fund managed by AQR Funds. Over the past 5 years, DGRO returned 10.82%/yr vs 10.94%/yr for QDSIX. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DGRO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QDSIX.
Performance
DGRO vs. QDSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 9.86% return, which is significantly higher than QDSIX's 5.00% return.
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 2.86%
- YTD
- 9.86%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 23.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.74%
- 5Y*
- 10.82%
- 10Y*
- 13.52%
QDSIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- 5.00%
- 6M
- 6.36%
- 1Y
- 13.68%
- 3Y*
- 13.04%
- 5Y*
- 10.94%
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO vs. QDSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 9.86% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 13.56% |
QDSIX AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund | 5.00% | 16.36% | 9.71% | 8.88% | 14.69% | 10.64% | 5.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRO and QDSIX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2020 | 0.19 |
The correlation between DGRO and QDSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (5 years) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRO vs. QDSIX — Risk / Return Rank
DGRO
QDSIX
DGRO vs. QDSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund (QDSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGRO | QDSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.52 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 7.16 | -3.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.36 | 20.24 | -6.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGRO vs. QDSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, which is greater than QDSIX's maximum drawdown of -7.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and QDSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRO | QDSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.10% | -7.06% | -28.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -1.96% | -4.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.03% | -6.90% | -7.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.31% | -7.06% | -12.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.41% | +1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.44% | -1.44% | -2.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 0.69% | +0.99% |
Volatility
DGRO vs. QDSIX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) has a higher volatility of 2.64% compared to AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund (QDSIX) at 1.73%. This indicates that DGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRO | QDSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 1.73% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.96% | 3.72% | +3.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.59% | 5.11% | +4.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.83% | 7.65% | +6.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 7.32% | +9.30% |
DGRO vs. QDSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than QDSIX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DGRO vs. QDSIX - Dividend Comparison
DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than QDSIX's 2.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.94% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
QDSIX AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund | 2.13% | 2.23% | 0.00% | 11.35% | 8.22% | 6.07% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRO and QDSIX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGRO has higher volatility (2.64%) compared to QDSIX (1.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs QDSIX's -7.06%.
QDSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGRO and QDSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer