PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRO vs. QARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRO vs. QARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DGRO having a 15.02% return and QARP slightly higher at 15.30%.


DGRO

1D
1.09%
1M
2.42%
6M
10.12%
YTD
15.02%
1Y
24.63%
3Y*
17.52%
5Y*
11.29%
10Y*
13.50%
ALL TIME*
12.59%

QARP

1D
1.03%
1M
3.67%
6M
10.06%
YTD
15.30%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
18.24%
5Y*
12.12%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$108.47M$103.38M$110.52M
$112.54K$118.75K$179.32K

DGRO vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
15.02%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-0.72%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
15.30%13.99%18.94%23.03%-14.62%31.82%14.83%30.70%-5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRO and QARP is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018

0.89

The correlation between DGRO and QARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DGRO vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRO
QARP

Financial Services

20.4%
12.4%

Healthcare

17.9%
14.0%

Technology

17.3%
24.1%

Consumer Defensive

11.9%
9.5%

Industrials

11.3%
7.9%

Utilities

7.3%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%
9.4%

Energy

4.8%
6.3%

Basic Materials

2.5%
2.5%

Communication Services

0.1%
10.5%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Financial Services

DGRO
20.4%
QARP
12.4%

Healthcare

DGRO
17.9%
QARP
14.0%

Technology

DGRO
17.3%
QARP
24.1%

Consumer Defensive

DGRO
11.9%
QARP
9.5%

Industrials

DGRO
11.3%
QARP
7.9%

Utilities

DGRO
7.3%
QARP
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRO
6.5%
QARP
9.4%

Energy

DGRO
4.8%
QARP
6.3%

Basic Materials

DGRO
2.5%
QARP
2.5%

Communication Services

DGRO
0.1%
QARP
10.5%

Real Estate

DGRO

-

QARP
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRO vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

QARP
QARP Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DGRO vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGROQARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.46

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

3.71

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.91

16.59

-1.69

DGRO vs. QARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the QARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRO and QARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGRO vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, roughly equal to the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and QARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGROQARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.10%

-35.44%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-7.26%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

-15.65%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

-22.75%

+3.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.40%

-4.37%

+0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

1.62%

+0.04%

Volatility

DGRO vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.79%. This indicates that DGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGROQARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

2.79%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.16%

8.20%

-1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.58%

10.70%

-1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.80%

15.53%

-1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.59%

19.51%

-2.92%

DGRO vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DGRO vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison

DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than QARP's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.87%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
1.00%1.14%1.39%1.28%1.68%1.34%1.61%1.85%1.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRO and QARP have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRO has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to QARP (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs QARP's -35.44%.

On 5-year performance, QARP leads with 12.12% vs 11.29% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QARP has performed better with a 12.12% return vs 11.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for QARP.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.00% for QARP.

DGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QARP is Quality Factor. DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for DGRO and 0.19% for QARP.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRO and QARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer