DGRO vs. QARP
DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) and QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while QARP is a Quality Factor fund tracking the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DGRO returned 11.29%/yr vs 12.12%/yr for QARP. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DGRO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QARP.
Performance
DGRO vs. QARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DGRO having a 15.02% return and QARP slightly higher at 15.30%.
DGRO
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- 6M
- 10.12%
- YTD
- 15.02%
- 1Y
- 24.63%
- 3Y*
- 17.52%
- 5Y*
- 11.29%
- 10Y*
- 13.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.59%
QARP
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- YTD
- 15.30%
- 1Y
- 26.81%
- 3Y*
- 18.24%
- 5Y*
- 12.12%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $108.47M | $103.38M | $110.52M | |
| $112.54K | $118.75K | $179.32K |
DGRO vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 15.02% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -0.72% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 15.30% | 13.99% | 18.94% | 23.03% | -14.62% | 31.82% | 14.83% | 30.70% | -5.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRO and QARP is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018 | 0.89 |
The correlation between DGRO and QARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DGRO vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGRO
QARP
Financial Services
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
DGRO
QARP
Healthcare
DGRO
QARP
Technology
DGRO
QARP
Consumer Defensive
DGRO
QARP
Industrials
DGRO
QARP
Utilities
DGRO
QARP
Consumer Cyclical
DGRO
QARP
Energy
DGRO
QARP
Basic Materials
DGRO
QARP
Communication Services
DGRO
QARP
Real Estate
DGRO
-
QARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRO vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank
DGRO
QARP
DGRO vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGRO | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.46 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.83 | 3.71 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.91 | 16.59 | -1.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGRO vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, roughly equal to the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and QARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRO | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.10% | -35.44% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -7.26% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.03% | -15.65% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.31% | -22.75% | +3.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.40% | -4.37% | +0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 1.62% | +0.04% |
Volatility
DGRO vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.79%. This indicates that DGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRO | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 2.79% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.16% | 8.20% | -1.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.58% | 10.70% | -1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.80% | 15.53% | -1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 19.51% | -2.92% |
DGRO vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DGRO vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison
DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than QARP's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.87% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.00% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRO and QARP have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGRO has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to QARP (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs QARP's -35.44%.
On 5-year performance, QARP leads with 12.12% vs 11.29% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QARP has performed better with a 12.12% return vs 11.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for QARP.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.00% for QARP.
DGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QARP is Quality Factor. DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for DGRO and 0.19% for QARP.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGRO and QARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer