PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DGRO vs. PLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DGRO vs. PLD

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while PLD (Prologis, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, DGRO returned 13.52%/yr vs 14.79%/yr for PLD. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

DGRO vs. PLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 9.86% return, which is significantly lower than PLD's 17.45% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRO has underperformed PLD with an annualized return of 13.52%, while PLD has yielded a comparatively higher 14.79% annualized return.

DGRO

1D
0.69%
1M
3.74%
YTD
9.86%
6M
9.27%
1Y
22.26%
3Y*
16.74%
5Y*
10.82%
10Y*
13.52%

PLD

1D
1.05%
1M
4.75%
YTD
17.45%
6M
16.07%
1Y
41.93%
3Y*
10.48%
5Y*
6.57%
10Y*
14.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRO vs. PLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF		9.86%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%
PLD
Prologis, Inc.		17.45%25.08%-18.12%21.58%-31.33%72.33%14.74%55.87%-6.25%25.94%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRO and PLD is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.56

The correlation between DGRO and PLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF

Prologis, Inc.

Often compared with DGRO:
DGRO vs. SCHDDGRO vs. VIGDGRO vs. VYMDGRO vs. VOODGRO vs. DGRWDGRO vs. DIVODGRO vs. HDV
Often compared with PLD:
PLD vs. VNQPLD vs. STAGPLD vs. PSAPLD vs. VOOPLD vs. EXRPLD vs. CUBEPLD vs. ILPT

Return for Risk

DGRO vs. PLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
PLD
PLD Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRO vs. PLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

DGROPLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.34
1.96

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.40
2.80

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.34

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

4.39

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.36

14.61

-1.25

DGRO vs. PLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the PLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRO and PLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGRO vs. PLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, smaller than the maximum PLD drawdown of -84.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and PLD.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DGROPLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.10%

-84.70%

+49.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-9.59%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

-31.37%

+17.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

-43.30%

+23.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

-43.30%

+8.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.77%

+2.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.44%

-17.36%

+13.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

2.89%

-1.21%

Volatility

DGRO vs. PLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 2.64%, while Prologis, Inc. (PLD) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DGROPLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

6.41%

-3.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.96%

14.49%

-7.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.59%

21.46%

-11.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.83%

26.97%

-13.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.62%

27.00%

-10.38%

Dividends

DGRO vs. PLD - Dividend Comparison

DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than PLD's 2.76% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF		1.94%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
PLD
Prologis, Inc.		2.76%3.16%3.63%2.61%2.80%1.50%2.33%2.38%3.27%2.73%3.18%3.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

DGRO and PLD have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLD has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to DGRO (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs PLD's -84.70%.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRO and PLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer