PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRO vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRO vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 13.15% return, which is significantly higher than ITOT's 9.48% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRO has underperformed ITOT with an annualized return of 13.29%, while ITOT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.42% annualized return.


DGRO

1D
0.83%
1M
3.14%
6M
10.33%
YTD
13.15%
1Y
20.83%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
11.10%
10Y*
13.29%
ALL TIME*
12.47%

ITOT

1D
0.07%
1M
0.48%
6M
7.83%
YTD
9.48%
1Y
17.56%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*
14.42%
ALL TIME*
10.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$96.40M$101.84M$109.07M
$228.53M$259.55M$322.53M

DGRO vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
13.15%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
9.48%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%20.71%30.67%-5.33%21.37%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRO and ITOT is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between DGRO and ITOT has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DGRO vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRO
ITOT

Financial Services

20.4%
11.9%

Healthcare

17.9%
9.5%

Technology

17.3%
36.4%

Consumer Defensive

11.9%
4.3%

Industrials

11.3%
9.9%

Utilities

7.3%
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%
9.5%

Energy

4.8%
3.1%

Basic Materials

2.5%
1.9%

Communication Services

0.1%
9.1%

Real Estate

-

2.3%

Financial Services

DGRO
20.4%
ITOT
11.9%

Healthcare

DGRO
17.9%
ITOT
9.5%

Technology

DGRO
17.3%
ITOT
36.4%

Consumer Defensive

DGRO
11.9%
ITOT
4.3%

Industrials

DGRO
11.3%
ITOT
9.9%

Utilities

DGRO
7.3%
ITOT
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRO
6.5%
ITOT
9.5%

Energy

DGRO
4.8%
ITOT
3.1%

Basic Materials

DGRO
2.5%
ITOT
1.9%

Communication Services

DGRO
0.1%
ITOT
9.1%

Real Estate

DGRO

-

ITOT
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRO vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRO vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGROITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.25

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

2.04

+1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.72

8.79

+3.92

DGRO vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRO and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGRO vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGROITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.10%

-55.20%

+20.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-8.90%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

-19.44%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

-25.36%

+6.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

-35.00%

-0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.31%

+2.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.41%

-6.94%

+3.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

2.06%

-0.38%

Volatility

DGRO vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 2.81%, while iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) has a volatility of 3.06%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGROITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

3.06%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.96%

10.02%

-3.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.52%

12.94%

-3.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.78%

17.44%

-3.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.57%

18.25%

-1.68%

DGRO vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DGRO vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than ITOT's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.90%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
1.02%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRO and ITOT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITOT has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to DGRO (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 10-year performance, ITOT leads with 14.42% vs 13.29% for DGRO. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 14.42% return vs 13.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 1.02% for ITOT.

DGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for DGRO and 0.03% for ITOT.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRO and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer