PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRO vs. FMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DGRO vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DGRO vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 10.10% return.


DGRO

1D
0.03%
1M
-4.46%
YTD
1.60%
6M
3.88%
1Y
16.44%
3Y*
14.60%
5Y*
10.14%
10Y*
12.81%

FMTM

1D
1.78%
1M
-6.27%
YTD
10.10%
6M
17.46%
1Y
39.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DGRO vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DGRO vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FMTM
FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRO vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGROFMTMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.14

1.68

-0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.66

2.20

-0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

3.23

-1.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.80

12.18

-5.38

DGRO vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRO Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the FMTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRO and FMTM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGROFMTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

1.68

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

1.71

-0.98

Correlation

The correlation between DGRO and FMTM is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DGRO vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than FMTM's 0.27% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
2.10%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
FMTM
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF
0.27%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

DGRO vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and FMTM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DGROFMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.10%

-12.12%

-22.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.92%

-12.12%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.70%

-6.27%

+1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-1.89%

-1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

3.21%

-0.84%

Volatility

DGRO vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 3.57%, while MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a volatility of 10.78%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DGROFMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

10.78%

-7.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.21%

19.28%

-12.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.47%

23.38%

-8.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.84%

23.19%

-9.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

23.19%

-6.56%