PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRO vs. CGDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRO vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 15.02% return, which is significantly lower than CGDV's 17.71% return.


DGRO

1D
1.09%
1M
2.42%
6M
10.12%
YTD
15.02%
1Y
24.63%
3Y*
17.52%
5Y*
11.29%
10Y*
13.50%
ALL TIME*
12.59%

CGDV

1D
1.63%
1M
4.35%
6M
14.84%
YTD
17.71%
1Y
27.24%
3Y*
24.53%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$203.57M$194.30M$186.82M
$108.47M$103.38M$110.52M

DGRO vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
15.02%15.69%16.62%10.47%-0.21%
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
17.71%25.50%20.10%28.81%-0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRO and CGDV is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between DGRO and CGDV has dropped to 0.66 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DGRO vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRO
CGDV

Financial Services

20.4%
6.7%

Healthcare

17.9%
8.2%

Technology

17.3%
34.5%

Consumer Defensive

11.9%
5.8%

Industrials

11.3%
13.6%

Utilities

7.3%
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%
12.6%

Energy

4.8%
3.9%

Basic Materials

2.5%
2.8%

Communication Services

0.1%
9.8%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Financial Services

DGRO
20.4%
CGDV
6.7%

Healthcare

DGRO
17.9%
CGDV
8.2%

Technology

DGRO
17.3%
CGDV
34.5%

Consumer Defensive

DGRO
11.9%
CGDV
5.8%

Industrials

DGRO
11.3%
CGDV
13.6%

Utilities

DGRO
7.3%
CGDV
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRO
6.5%
CGDV
12.6%

Energy

DGRO
4.8%
CGDV
3.9%

Basic Materials

DGRO
2.5%
CGDV
2.8%

Communication Services

DGRO
0.1%
CGDV
9.8%

Real Estate

DGRO

-

CGDV
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRO vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

CGDV
CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DGRO vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGROCGDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.40

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

2.81

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.91

13.10

+1.80

DGRO vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRO and CGDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGRO vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and CGDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGROCGDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.10%

-21.82%

-13.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-9.75%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

-14.28%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.40%

-3.51%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

2.08%

-0.42%

Volatility

DGRO vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 3.05%, while Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a volatility of 3.84%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGROCGDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

3.84%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.16%

10.26%

-3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.58%

12.64%

-3.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.80%

15.50%

-1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.59%

15.50%

+1.09%

DGRO vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRO vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than CGDV's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
1.15%1.29%1.60%1.65%1.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.87%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRO and CGDV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGDV has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to DGRO (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs CGDV's -21.82%.

On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 24.53% vs 17.52% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 24.53% return vs 17.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CGDV.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.15% for CGDV.

DGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while CGDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for DGRO and 0.33% for CGDV.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRO and CGDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer