DGRO vs. CGDV
DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) and CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. DGRO is passively managed, while CGDV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DGRO returned 16.63%/yr vs 24.27%/yr for CGDV. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DGRO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGDV.
Performance
DGRO vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly lower than CGDV's 10.15% return.
DGRO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 8.47%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 21.90%
- 3Y*
- 16.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 13.26%
CGDV
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- YTD
- 10.15%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- 24.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 8.47% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -0.21% |
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 10.15% | 25.50% | 20.10% | 28.81% | -0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRO and CGDV is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022 | 0.89 |
The correlation between DGRO and CGDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DGRO vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGRO
CGDV
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
DGRO
CGDV
Technology
DGRO
CGDV
Healthcare
DGRO
CGDV
Consumer Defensive
DGRO
CGDV
Industrials
DGRO
CGDV
Utilities
DGRO
CGDV
Consumer Cyclical
DGRO
CGDV
Energy
DGRO
CGDV
Basic Materials
DGRO
CGDV
Communication Services
DGRO
CGDV
Real Estate
DGRO
-
CGDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRO vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank
DGRO
CGDV
DGRO vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGRO | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.44 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 2.84 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.12 | 13.37 | -0.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGRO | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 2.34 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 1.21 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
DGRO vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and CGDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRO | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.10% | -21.82% | -13.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -9.75% | +3.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.03% | -14.28% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -2.22% | +1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.44% | -3.61% | +0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 2.07% | -0.40% |
Volatility
DGRO vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 2.32%, while Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRO | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.32% | 3.60% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.95% | 9.47% | -2.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.52% | 11.85% | -2.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.82% | 15.51% | -1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 15.51% | +1.12% |
DGRO vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGRO vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison
DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than CGDV's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 1.19% | 1.29% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.96% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRO and CGDV have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGDV has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to DGRO (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs CGDV's -21.82%.
On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 24.27% vs 16.63% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 24.27% return vs 16.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CGDV.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.19% for CGDV.
DGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while CGDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for DGRO and 0.33% for CGDV.
CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGRO and CGDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer