PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRE vs. EDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRE vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRE achieves a 31.30% return, which is significantly higher than EDIV's 6.42% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRE has outperformed EDIV with an annualized return of 9.71%, while EDIV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.16% annualized return.


DGRE

1D
-0.94%
1M
8.34%
YTD
31.30%
6M
36.66%
1Y
58.03%
3Y*
24.56%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
9.71%

EDIV

1D
-1.27%
1M
2.48%
YTD
6.42%
6M
7.80%
1Y
14.08%
3Y*
19.05%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
9.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRE vs. EDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund
31.30%27.47%3.63%18.46%-21.86%2.55%10.85%21.12%-16.36%33.61%
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
6.42%16.45%12.75%41.91%-15.31%11.21%-9.95%11.80%-6.16%28.20%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRE and EDIV is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2013

0.81

The correlation between DGRE and EDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (3 years) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DGRE vs. EDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRE
EDIV

Technology

38.6%
8.4%

Financial Services

11.8%
29.7%

Industrials

7.8%
9.7%

Basic Materials

4.4%
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

2.7%
11.8%

Healthcare

2.6%
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
12.8%

Energy

1.1%
3.2%

Utilities

0.9%
2.5%

Communication Services

0.8%
13.8%

Real Estate

0.3%
5.1%

Technology

DGRE
38.6%
EDIV
8.4%

Financial Services

DGRE
11.8%
EDIV
29.7%

Industrials

DGRE
7.8%
EDIV
9.7%

Basic Materials

DGRE
4.4%
EDIV
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRE
2.7%
EDIV
11.8%

Healthcare

DGRE
2.6%
EDIV
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

DGRE
2.3%
EDIV
12.8%

Energy

DGRE
1.1%
EDIV
3.2%

Utilities

DGRE
0.9%
EDIV
2.5%

Communication Services

DGRE
0.8%
EDIV
13.8%

Real Estate

DGRE
0.3%
EDIV
5.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRE vs. EDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRE
DGRE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DGRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

EDIV
EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRE vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGREEDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.22

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.26

1.37

+2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.40

4.23

+13.18

DGRE vs. EDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRE Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is higher than the EDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRE and EDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGREEDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91

1.16

+1.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.78

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.53

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.17

+0.15

Drawdowns

DGRE vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRE drawdown since its inception was -36.95%, smaller than the maximum EDIV drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRE and EDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGREEDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.95%

-53.36%

+16.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.68%

-10.36%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.65%

-13.84%

-6.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.82%

-28.32%

-6.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.95%

-40.76%

+3.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-4.07%

+3.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.00%

-19.36%

+7.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

3.34%

0.00%

Volatility

DGRE vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) has a higher volatility of 8.88% compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) at 4.11%. This indicates that DGRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGREEDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.88%

4.11%

+4.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.97%

10.03%

+7.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.08%

12.19%

+7.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.11%

13.83%

+4.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.64%

17.49%

+2.15%

DGRE vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than EDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRE vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison

DGRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than EDIV's 4.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.18%1.65%1.90%2.22%4.38%2.56%2.11%2.32%2.71%3.12%3.18%3.01%
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.50%4.69%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.94%5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRE and EDIV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRE has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to EDIV (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRE dropped -36.95% vs EDIV's -53.36%.

On 10-year performance, DGRE leads with 9.71% vs 9.16% for EDIV. On fees, DGRE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, EDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRE has performed better with a 9.71% return vs 9.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.

EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 1.18% for DGRE.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for DGRE and 0.49% for EDIV.

DGRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRE and EDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer