DGR.TO vs. DGRC.TO
DGR.TO (CI U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF) and DGRC.TO (CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF) are both Quality Factor funds from CI - DGR.TO tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index CAD while DGRC.TO tracks the WisdomTree Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DGR.TO returned 9.79%/yr vs 13.81%/yr for DGRC.TO. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DGR.TO charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for DGRC.TO.
Performance
DGR.TO vs. DGRC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGR.TO achieves a 6.15% return, which is significantly lower than DGRC.TO's 19.68% return.
DGR.TO
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 4.67%
- YTD
- 6.15%
- 1Y
- 13.25%
- 3Y*
- 11.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.86%
DGRC.TO
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- 6M
- 19.75%
- YTD
- 19.68%
- 1Y
- 36.25%
- 3Y*
- 20.11%
- 5Y*
- 13.81%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.13%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$32.50K | CA$91.64K | CA$88.11K | |
| CA$279.39K | CA$354.27K | CA$484.71K |
DGR.TO vs. DGRC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGR.TO CI U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF | 6.15% | 10.57% | 16.04% | 17.92% | -8.16% | 24.28% | 10.08% | 28.48% | -7.88% | 10.22% |
DGRC.TO CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF | 19.68% | 27.20% | 12.36% | 7.79% | -1.70% | 20.84% | 7.22% | 18.60% | -4.73% | 3.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGR.TO and DGRC.TO is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2017 | 0.52 |
The correlation between DGR.TO and DGRC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DGR.TO vs. DGRC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGR.TO
DGRC.TO
Technology
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
DGR.TO
DGRC.TO
Healthcare
DGR.TO
DGRC.TO
-
Industrials
DGR.TO
DGRC.TO
Communication Services
DGR.TO
DGRC.TO
Financial Services
DGR.TO
DGRC.TO
Consumer Cyclical
DGR.TO
DGRC.TO
Consumer Defensive
DGR.TO
DGRC.TO
Energy
DGR.TO
DGRC.TO
Basic Materials
DGR.TO
DGRC.TO
Utilities
DGR.TO
DGRC.TO
-
Real Estate
DGR.TO
-
DGRC.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGR.TO vs. DGRC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DGR.TO
DGRC.TO
DGR.TO vs. DGRC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGR.TO) and CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGR.TO | DGRC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.54 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 5.92 | -4.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.26 | 22.78 | -17.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGR.TO vs. DGRC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGR.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.73%, smaller than the maximum DGRC.TO drawdown of -36.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGR.TO and DGRC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGR.TO | DGRC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.73% | -36.59% | +5.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.55% | -5.99% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.65% | -12.90% | -3.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.92% | -15.39% | -2.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -0.42% | -1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -3.18% | -0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 1.56% | +0.65% |
Volatility
DGR.TO vs. DGRC.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGR.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.72% compared to CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO) at 2.50%. This indicates that DGR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGR.TO | DGRC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.72% | 2.50% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.27% | 8.49% | -0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.55% | 11.76% | -1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.08% | 12.51% | +1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 14.63% | +0.58% |
DGR.TO vs. DGRC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGR.TO has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRC.TO's 0.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGR.TO vs. DGRC.TO - Dividend Comparison
DGR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than DGRC.TO's 2.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGR.TO CI U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF | 1.14% | 1.24% | 0.94% | 1.53% | 1.70% | 1.26% | 1.29% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 1.29% | 0.62% |
DGRC.TO CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF | 2.26% | 2.58% | 2.46% | 2.56% | 2.48% | 1.87% | 3.06% | 2.20% | 1.79% | 0.23% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGR.TO and DGRC.TO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DGRC.TO is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DGRC.TO is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DGR.TO.
DGR.TO tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index CAD, while DGRC.TO tracks WisdomTree Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DGR.TO and 0.27% for DGRC.TO.
Find the right allocation for DGR.TO and DGRC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer