DGR.TO vs. CINF.TO

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

DGR.TO (CI U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF) and CINF.TO (CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool) are both exchange-traded funds - DGR.TO is a Dividend fund managed by CI, while CINF.TO is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by CI. Over the past 5 years, DGR.TO returned 10.16%/yr vs 12.24%/yr for CINF.TO. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DGR.TO vs. CINF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGR.TO) and CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGR.TO achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than CINF.TO's 17.05% return.

DGR.TO

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -0.09%
• 6M: 5.53%
• YTD: 6.62%
• 1Y: 13.36%
• 3Y*: 12.75%
• 5Y*: 10.16%
• 10Y*: 11.99%

CINF.TO

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: -0.38%
• 6M: 13.71%
• YTD: 17.05%
• 1Y: 21.62%
• 3Y*: 16.65%
• 5Y*: 12.24%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGR.TO vs. CINF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DGR.TO CI U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF	6.62%	10.57%	16.04%	17.92%	-8.16%	24.28%	22.57%
CINF.TO CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool	17.05%	12.54%	16.53%	5.27%	5.03%	13.56%	7.55%

Correlation

The correlation between DGR.TO and CINF.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2020	0.37

The correlation between DGR.TO and CINF.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DGR.TO vs. CINF.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DGR.TO	CINF.TO
Technology	33.9%	-
Communication Services	13.0%	1.8%
Healthcare	12.7%	-
Industrials	9.6%	31.2%
Financial Services	8.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	-
Energy	4.9%	16.7%
Basic Materials	3.3%	-
Utilities	0.2%	40.5%
Real Estate	-	9.8%

Return for Risk

DGR.TO vs. CINF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGR.TO

DGR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 44
DGR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
DGR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
DGR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
DGR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
DGR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 47

CINF.TO

CINF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 85
CINF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
CINF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
CINF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 86
CINF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
CINF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGR.TO vs. CINF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGR.TO) and CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DGR.TO	CINF.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	2.27	-0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	3.11	-1.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.41	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	4.09	-2.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.21	12.09	-5.89

DGR.TO vs. CINF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the CINF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGR.TO and CINF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DGR.TO vs. CINF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGR.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.73%, which is greater than CINF.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGR.TO and CINF.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	DGR.TO	CINF.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.73%	-12.27%	-18.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.55%	-5.31%	-3.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.65%	-9.62%	-7.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.92%	-12.27%	-5.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.40%	-1.07%	-0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.51%	-2.05%	-1.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	1.79%	+0.37%

Volatility

DGR.TO vs. CINF.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGR.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.58% compared to CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO) at 2.03%. This indicates that DGR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CINF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DGR.TO	CINF.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.58%	2.03%	+0.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.16%	7.75%	+0.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.42%	9.56%	+0.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.11%	11.96%	+2.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.20%	12.07%	+3.13%

Dividends

DGR.TO vs. CINF.TO - Dividend Comparison

DGR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than CINF.TO's 2.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CINF.TO CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool	2.42%	2.80%	3.06%	3.45%	3.51%	3.56%	2.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DGR.TO CI U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF	1.14%	1.24%	0.94%	1.53%	1.70%	1.26%	1.29%	1.67%	1.94%	1.29%	0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DGR.TO and CINF.TO in my portfolio?

DGR.TO and CINF.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between DGR.TO and CINF.TO?

DGR.TO is categorized as Dividend, while CINF.TO is Utilities Equities.