DGR.TO vs. CIAI.TO
DGR.TO (CI U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF) and CIAI.TO (CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGR.TO is a Quality Factor fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index CAD, while CIAI.TO is a Artificial Intelligence fund actively managed by CI. DGR.TO is passively managed, while CIAI.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, DGR.TO returned 13.25% vs 31.56% for CIAI.TO. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DGR.TO charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CIAI.TO.
Performance
DGR.TO vs. CIAI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGR.TO achieves a 6.15% return, which is significantly lower than CIAI.TO's 19.72% return.
DGR.TO
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 4.67%
- YTD
- 6.15%
- 1Y
- 13.25%
- 3Y*
- 11.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.86%
CIAI.TO
- 1D
- 2.56%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- 6M
- 17.06%
- YTD
- 19.72%
- 1Y
- 31.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 31.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$1.13M | CA$1.20M | CA$2.71M | |
| CA$32.50K | CA$91.64K | CA$88.11K |
DGR.TO vs. CIAI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DGR.TO CI U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF | 6.15% | 10.57% | 9.69% |
CIAI.TO CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 19.72% | 18.84% | 29.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGR.TO and CIAI.TO is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2024 | 0.54 |
The correlation between DGR.TO and CIAI.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGR.TO vs. CIAI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DGR.TO
CIAI.TO
DGR.TO vs. CIAI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGR.TO) and CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGR.TO | CIAI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.18 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 1.44 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.26 | 3.79 | +1.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGR.TO vs. CIAI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGR.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.73%, roughly equal to the maximum CIAI.TO drawdown of -31.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGR.TO and CIAI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGR.TO | CIAI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.73% | -31.22% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.55% | -18.93% | +10.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -9.81% | +7.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -6.50% | +2.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 7.20% | -4.99% |
Volatility
DGR.TO vs. CIAI.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CI U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGR.TO) is 2.72%, while CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) has a volatility of 10.77%. This indicates that DGR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIAI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGR.TO | CIAI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.72% | 10.77% | -8.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.27% | 23.36% | -15.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.55% | 28.32% | -17.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.08% | 29.48% | -15.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 29.48% | -14.27% |
DGR.TO vs. CIAI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGR.TO has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than CIAI.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGR.TO vs. CIAI.TO - Dividend Comparison
DGR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, while CIAI.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIAI.TO CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DGR.TO CI U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF | 1.14% | 1.24% | 0.94% | 1.53% | 1.70% | 1.26% | 1.29% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 1.29% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGR.TO and CIAI.TO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DGR.TO is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DGR.TO is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CIAI.TO.
DGR.TO is categorized as Quality Factor, while CIAI.TO is Artificial Intelligence. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DGR.TO and 0.50% for CIAI.TO.
Find the right allocation for DGR.TO and CIAI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer