PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIAI.TO vs. TEC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CIAI.TO vs. TEC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) and TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF (TEC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CIAI.TO vs. TEC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CIAI.TO
CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
-5.51%18.84%29.92%
TEC.TO
TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF
-9.09%15.45%26.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIAI.TO achieves a -5.51% return, which is significantly higher than TEC.TO's -9.09% return.


CIAI.TO

1D
5.06%
1M
-3.65%
YTD
-5.51%
6M
-6.22%
1Y
34.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TEC.TO

1D
3.86%
1M
-3.17%
YTD
-9.09%
6M
-8.64%
1Y
18.11%
3Y*
24.37%
5Y*
14.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CIAI.TO vs. TEC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIAI.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TEC.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CIAI.TO vs. TEC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIAI.TO
CIAI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
CIAI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIAI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIAI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
CIAI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIAI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

TEC.TO
TEC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
TEC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
TEC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIAI.TO vs. TEC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) and TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF (TEC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIAI.TOTEC.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

0.75

+0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.65

1.19

+0.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.17

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.04

+0.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.11

3.05

+2.07

CIAI.TO vs. TEC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIAI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the TEC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIAI.TO and TEC.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CIAI.TOTEC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

0.75

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.80

-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between CIAI.TO and TEC.TO is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CIAI.TO vs. TEC.TO - Dividend Comparison

CIAI.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TEC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
CIAI.TO
CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TEC.TO
TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF
0.13%0.13%0.12%0.21%0.31%0.22%0.33%0.28%

Drawdowns

CIAI.TO vs. TEC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIAI.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.22%, smaller than the maximum TEC.TO drawdown of -35.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIAI.TO and TEC.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CIAI.TOTEC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.22%

-35.31%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.93%

-17.52%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.83%

-14.34%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.86%

-8.17%

+1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.69%

5.98%

+0.71%

Volatility

CIAI.TO vs. TEC.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) has a higher volatility of 10.01% compared to TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF (TEC.TO) at 6.90%. This indicates that CIAI.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TEC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CIAI.TOTEC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.01%

6.90%

+3.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.28%

13.42%

+5.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.74%

24.28%

+6.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.71%

22.32%

+6.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.71%

23.92%

+4.79%